---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Powitt Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Powitt Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-powitt-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Powitt Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 21 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Powitt Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Powitt Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Shanghai |  |
| Founded | 2006 |  |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |  |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Powitt Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 21 | +616 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 720 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 636 W | +114 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Powitt Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.69% | +1.11 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 22.90% | +0.72 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Powitt Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.006 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 21 (100%) | +64 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Powitt Solar skews to higher efficiency: 48% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Powitt Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 11 (52.4%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 10 (47.6%) |


## Power distribution

Powitt Solar offers more 600W+ panels (62% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Powitt Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 8 (38.1%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 8 (38.1%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 5 (23.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (100%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Powitt Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 21 (100.0%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Powitt Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PW-66M720HG12-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/powitt-solar-pw-66m720hg12-bd) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [PW-66M715HG12-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/powitt-solar-pw-66m715hg12-bd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PW-66M710HG12-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/powitt-solar-pw-66m710hg12-bd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PW-66M705HG12-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/powitt-solar-pw-66m705hg12-bd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [PW-66M700HG12-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/powitt-solar-pw-66m700hg12-bd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PW-66M695HG12-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/powitt-solar-pw-66m695hg12-bd) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PW-66M690HG12-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/powitt-solar-pw-66m690hg12-bd) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PW-66M640HM10L-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/powitt-solar-pw-66m640hm10l-bd) | 640 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [PW-66M635HM10L-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/powitt-solar-pw-66m635hm10l-bd) | 635 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PW-66M630HM10L-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/powitt-solar-pw-66m630hm10l-bd) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Powitt Solar represent two markedly different tiers of the global solar manufacturing landscape. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is listed on the NYSE and ranks among the world's largest solar panel producers, with a production capacity of 130 GW, over 33,800 employees, and a catalog of 545 active panel models. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status - confirming its financial standing with project finance institutions - and has earned consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer, with over 300 GW of cumulative global installations. Powitt Solar, founded around 2007 and based in Jiangsu province, China, operates at a considerably smaller scale, with an estimated production capacity of approximately 1.2 GW and a focused lineup of just 21 models. Powitt does not currently hold Tier 1 bankable status from independent rating bodies, which constrains its eligibility for projects dependent on third-party debt financing.

On the technical side, both manufacturers target different buyer profiles. Jinko's broad portfolio - anchored by TOPCon technology in roughly 39% of its lineup, a maximum module efficiency of 24.8%, and an average module output of 511 Wp - serves residential rooftop installs, utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications across established European and global distribution networks. Powitt takes a more concentrated approach: its entire 21-model catalog consists of N-type bifacial modules, yielding a notably higher average output of 636 Wp and a slightly better average temperature coefficient of -0.298%/°C compared to Jinko's -0.308%/°C. Powitt also declares a 30-year product warranty, modestly above Jinko's portfolio average of 28.5 years. This profile positions Powitt competitively for ground-mount utility-scale or agrivoltaic installations where bifacial albedo gain adds measurable yield uplift.

For international buyers comparing the two, the choice pivots on project risk profile and financing requirements. Jinko Solar is the lower-risk selection for most residential, commercial, and financed large-scale projects, given its Tier 1 status, manufacturing scale, and deep track record. Powitt Solar may appeal to buyers specifically targeting 100% N-type bifacial modules - potentially at competitive price points - but thorough due diligence on long-term warranty backing, after-sales support infrastructure, and financial stability is strongly advisable before large-scale procurement commitments.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Powitt Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-powitt-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Powitt Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-powitt-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Powitt Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-powitt-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-powitt-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.