---
title: "Jinko Solar vs PolyCrown Solar Tech - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs PolyCrown Solar Tech solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-polycrown-solar-tech"
---

# Jinko Solar vs PolyCrown Solar Tech

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 75 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | PolyCrown Solar Tech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Ningbo |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 101-200 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 0.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://www.polycrown-solar.com](http://www.polycrown-solar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Polycrown Solar Tech Co., Ltd. is a high-tech enterprise founded in 2014, specializing in the research, development, production, and installation of solar products, including solar cells, solar panels, and solar projects. They have passed ISO9001, ISO14001, and OHSAS18001 system certifications, as well as TUV...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 75 | +562 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 730 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 472 W | +51 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.69% | +1.11 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.75% | +0.42 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.294%/°C | +0.010 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 14 (19%) | +18 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 25.9 yrs | +2.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | PolyCrown Solar Tech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 2 (2.7%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 16 (21.3%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 24 (32.0%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 24 (32.0%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 9 (12.0%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | PolyCrown Solar Tech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 21 (28.0%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 24 (32.0%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 11 (14.7%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 15 (20.0%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 4 (5.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (47%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | PolyCrown Solar Tech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 7 (9.3%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 35 (46.7%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 33 (44.0%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, PolyCrown Solar Tech


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NS-700MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-700mh-132) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-690MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-690mh-132) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NS-670MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-670mh-132) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [NS-665MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-665mh-132) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NS-660MH-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-660mh-120) | 660 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-660MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-660mh-132) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NS-655MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-655mh-132) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and PolyCrown Solar Tech are both Chinese solar panel manufacturers, but they occupy vastly different positions in the global PV landscape. Founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, Jinko Solar is the world's largest solar module producer by shipment volume, dispatching over 92 GW of modules in 2024 alone and holding a production capacity of 130 GW per year. With nearly 34,000 employees, full Bloomberg Tier 1 bankability status, and a presence in over 190 countries, Jinko is a cornerstone supplier for international projects of any scale. PolyCrown Solar Tech, founded in 2014 and headquartered in Ningbo, operates at a fraction of that scale - employing between 100 and 200 people and producing approximately 0.2 GW annually. The company holds standard industry certifications (ISO9001, TUV, CE) but does not carry Tier 1 status, which limits its access to bank-financed or institutionally backed projects.

On the technology side, Jinko Solar's portfolio spans 545 panel models led by its Tiger Neo TOPCon series, reaching up to 735 Wp and a maximum module efficiency of 24.8%, with an average efficiency across the lineup of 22.0%. Bifacial panels account for 31.9% of its range, and average product warranty stands at 28.5 years - both figures reflecting a manufacturer investing heavily in high-performance segments. TOPCon is the leading cell technology in Jinko's catalog (39.4% of panels), supported by verified world-record cell efficiencies and consistent PVEL Top Performer recognition. PolyCrown offers 75 models with a maximum output of 730 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 23.69%; N-type cells lead its catalog at 46.7%, with an average efficiency of 21.75% and an average warranty of 25.9 years. Its slightly better average temperature coefficient (-0.294 vs. -0.308 %/°C) is a marginal technical advantage but unlikely to be decisive in most project evaluations. Jinko is well suited to utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial (C&I) rooftop systems, and residential installations where long-term bankability and supply chain reliability matter. PolyCrown may serve cost-sensitive small residential or off-grid projects where Tier 1 status is not a financing requirement, but its limited scale and lower market visibility make it a higher-risk choice for buyers who need robust long-term warranty support and guaranteed module availability over multi-year project timelines.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the substantially lower-risk option across virtually all project categories, backed by verified performance data, global service infrastructure, and institutional-grade bankability. PolyCrown represents a niche, budget-oriented alternative whose appeal is constrained by limited independent performance data and a small operational footprint.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs PolyCrown Solar Tech](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-polycrown-solar-tech)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs PolyCrown Solar Tech](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-polycrown-solar-tech)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs PolyCrown Solar Tech](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-polycrown-solar-tech)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-polycrown-solar-tech

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

