---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Peimar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Peimar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-peimar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Peimar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 5 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Peimar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Italy |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Torino |
| Founded | 2006 | 2012 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 50 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 0.3 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.peimar.com](https://www.peimar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Peimar is an Italian manufacturer of photovoltaic modules. Based in Turin, the company designs and produces solar panels for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications, with a focus on the European market.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Peimar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 5 | +632 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 595 W | +140 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 440 W | +83 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Peimar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.04% | +1.76 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 20.23% | +1.95 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Peimar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.346%/°C | +0.042 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 2 (40%) | +4 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Peimar skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Peimar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 2 (40.0%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 1 (20.0%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 2 (40.0%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Peimar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 2 (40.0%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 1 (20.0%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 2 (40.0%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (60%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Peimar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 2 (40.0%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 3 (60.0%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Peimar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [OR10H595MNDB](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h595mndb) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SA500M (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sa500m-fb) | 500 | 21.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [OR10H450MNDB (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h450mndb-fb) | 450 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SG330P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg330p) | 330 | 17.0 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline |
| 5 | [SG325P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg325p) | 325 | 16.7 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Peimar occupy fundamentally different positions in the global photovoltaic industry. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is the world's largest solar panel manufacturer by shipment volume, with a production capacity of 130 GW, over 33,800 employees, and a well-established Tier 1 bankable status recognized by major financial institutions - the company is publicly listed on the NYSE. Peimar, by contrast, is an Italian niche manufacturer founded in 2012, employing approximately 50 people and operating at a production capacity of just 0.3 GW, without a Tier 1 designation. Both companies lead their respective portfolios with TOPCon cell technology: at Peimar it accounts for 87.5% of a tightly focused eight-model range, while at Jinko it represents 39.4% of a 545-model lineup. Peimar's curated portfolio delivers a higher average module efficiency of 22.8% (maximum 23.04%) compared to Jinko's 22.0% average (maximum 24.8%), and a marginally superior temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C versus -0.31%/°C - an advantage in warm-climate deployments.

Jinko Solar's unmatched scale and Tier 1 status make it the preferred choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial (C&I) installations, and any engagement where lender bankability requirements must be met. Its broad 545-model portfolio covers the full spectrum from standard residential rooftop installs to high-power bifacial modules for grid-scale farms, supported by a track record exceeding 300 GW of global installations across more than 160 countries. Peimar's strengths are concentrated in a premium segment: 87.5% of its models are bifacial, average output stands at 565 Wp, and the product warranty extends to 30 years - positioning it well for high-efficiency residential rooftop installs and commercial rooftop projects in European markets where per-square-meter yield and long-term guarantees are prioritized.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision comes down to project scale and risk profile. Jinko Solar offers superior supply security, broad model availability, competitive pricing, and a globally bankable track record that simplifies project financing. Peimar suits buyers who prioritize European manufacturing provenance, a focused premium bifacial lineup with a 30-year warranty, and are willing to accept a smaller product range and the absence of Tier 1 status - particularly for niche residential or commercial projects where end-customers place explicit value on non-Asian origin.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-peimar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-peimar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-peimar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-peimar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.