---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Panasonic - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Panasonic solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-panasonic"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Panasonic

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 25 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Panasonic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Japan |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Kadoma, near Ōsaka |
| Founded | 2006 | 1918 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 9,500+ |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 1+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | Tokyo Stock Exchange: 6752 |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.panasonic.com/global/energy/](https://www.panasonic.com/global/energy/) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Panasonic is a global leader in the development of innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors. The company was founded in 1918 by Konosuke Matsushita and has been committed to enhancing the quality...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Panasonic | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 25 | +612 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 430 W | +305 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 367 W | +155 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Panasonic | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.20% | +2.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 20.68% | +1.49 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Panasonic | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.267%/°C | +0.037 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 4 (16%) | +20 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Panasonic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 6 (24.0%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 8 (32.0%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 8 (32.0%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 3 (12.0%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Panasonic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 19 (76.0%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 6 (24.0%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (88%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Panasonic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 3 (12.0%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 22 (88.0%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Panasonic


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [EVPV430HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv430hk2) | 430 | 22.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [EVPV420HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv420hk2) | 420 | 21.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [EVPV410H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410h) | 410 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [EVPV410HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410hk) | 410 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [EVPV400H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv400h) | 400 | 21.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [EVPV400HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv400hk) | 400 | 21.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [EVPV390HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv390hk) | 390 | 21.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [EVPV390H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv390h) | 390 | 21.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [EVPV380](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv380) | 380 | 21.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [EVPV370](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv370) | 370 | 21.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, listed on the NYSE with a production capacity of 130 GW and a confirmed Tier 1 bankable status. The company employs over 33,800 people and has surpassed 300 GW of cumulative global shipments, making it a dominant force across every major market. Its portfolio of 545 modules spans output levels up to 735 Wp, with an average efficiency of 22.0% and a laboratory-verified TOPCon cell record of 27.79%, independently confirmed by Germany's ISFH. Panasonic, a Japanese conglomerate founded in 1918 and listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, built a premium reputation in the residential solar segment through its EverVolt HJT lineup. However, Panasonic formally exited the solar and battery storage business in April 2025, halting all new manufacturing while committing to honor its existing 25-year warranties on installed products.

Jinko's broad lineup - with nearly 32% of its portfolio consisting of bifacial modules and a growing TOPCon share of 39.4% - positions it strongly for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial (C&I) installations, and any procurement requiring consistent, high-volume supply. The average warranty of 28.5 years across the portfolio adds further financial security for project developers and EPCs. Panasonic's compact range of 25 modules topped out at 430 Wp and 22.2% maximum efficiency, but its defining technical advantage was the HJT temperature coefficient of -0.267%/°C - meaningfully better than Jinko's -0.308%/°C and among the best values in the industry. This made Panasonic panels an outstanding choice for residential rooftop installations in warmer climates, where thermal derating is a significant factor in annual yield.

For buyers making new procurement decisions today, Jinko Solar is the only viable option of the two - offering scale, supply chain depth, competitive pricing, and active product development. Panasonic panels may still surface through distributor stock or secondary markets, and their HJT quality is genuinely excellent, but with manufacturing permanently discontinued, no long-term supply strategy can be built around the brand. Buyers who specifically need low temperature coefficients comparable to Panasonic's HJT performance should explore alternative HJT manufacturers that remain active in production.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Panasonic](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-panasonic)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Panasonic](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-panasonic)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Panasonic](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-panasonic)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-panasonic

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.