---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Ocean Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Ocean Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-ocean-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Ocean Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 36 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Ocean Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 2006 | 2012 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 200+ |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 1 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://www.oceansolar.cn](http://www.oceansolar.cn) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Ocean Solar is a high-tech enterprise specializing in the production of high-efficiency monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar modules. They serve domestic and overseas installers, distributors, and factories engaged in off-grid and on-grid solar energy systems. The company is committed to providing customers with...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Ocean Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 36 | +601 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 750 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 596 W | +74 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Ocean Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.20% | +0.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 23.06% | +0.88 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Ocean Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.004 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Ocean Solar skews to higher efficiency: 58% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Ocean Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 2 (5.6%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 13 (36.1%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 21 (58.3%) |


## Power distribution

Ocean Solar offers more 600W+ panels (58% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Ocean Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 7 (19.4%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 8 (22.2%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 15 (41.7%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 6 (16.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Ocean Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 36 (100.0%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Ocean Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AOX-132G12HC750W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc750w) | 750 | 24.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AOX-132G12HC740W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc740w) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AOX-132G12HC730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AOX-132G12HC720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AOX-132G12HC710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AOX-132G12HC700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AOX-132G12RHC650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12rhc650w) | 650 | 24.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AOX-132G12RHC645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12rhc645w) | 645 | 23.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AOX-132G12RHC640W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12rhc640w) | 640 | 23.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AOX-132G12RHC635W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12rhc635w) | 635 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 in China and is listed on the NYSE, giving it a level of financial transparency and institutional visibility rare among solar manufacturers. With an annual production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce exceeding 33,000 employees, it is one of the top global module producers by volume. It holds Tier 1 bankable status according to BNEF and is the only solar company worldwide to have achieved 100% bankability recognition for ten consecutive years. Ocean Solar, established in 2012 and also headquartered in China, operates on a substantially smaller scale - 1 GW of production capacity and over 200 employees - and does not hold Tier 1 status. The company has exported a cumulative total exceeding 2 GW to more than 30 countries, reflecting a growing but still niche international presence.

Jinko Solar's broad portfolio of 545 modules reaches a maximum output of 735 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 24.8%, with roughly 32% of its catalog comprising bifacial panels - making it well suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where bifacial energy gain and bankability are decisive. Ocean Solar's more focused lineup of 36 modules is built entirely on TOPCon cell technology, delivering a notably higher average module power (596 Wp vs. 511 Wp for Jinko) and a marginally better average temperature coefficient for Pmax (-0.30 vs. -0.308 %/°C). This positions Ocean Solar competitively for residential rooftop installations where space efficiency and per-panel output are the primary concerns. Its OEM/ODM services also add appeal for integrators seeking customized module configurations.

For international buyers, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice for large-scale and bankable projects, backed by a proven global track record, a NYSE listing, and unmatched supply chain depth. Ocean Solar may attract buyers seeking a fully TOPCon-focused portfolio with above-average wattage at potentially competitive price points, but the absence of Tier 1 status and the company's smaller operational scale warrant additional due diligence for any project finance or long-term warranty exposure assessment.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Ocean Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ocean-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Ocean Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ocean-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Ocean Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-ocean-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-ocean-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.