---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Neo Solar Power - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Neo Solar Power solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-neo-solar-power"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Neo Solar Power

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 30 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Neo Solar Power leans bifacial (67% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Neo Solar Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Taiwan |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Hsinchu |
| Founded | 2006 | 2005 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.nsp.com](https://www.nsp.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Neo Solar Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 30 | +607 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 715 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 535 W | +12 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Neo Solar Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.03% | +1.77 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.79% | +0.39 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Neo Solar Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.320%/°C | +0.016 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 20 (67%) | +30 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 27.5 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Neo Solar Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 1 (3.3%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 4 (13.3%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 11 (36.7%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 12 (40.0%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 2 (6.7%) |


## Power distribution

Neo Solar Power offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Neo Solar Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 1 (3.3%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 14 (46.7%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 5 (16.7%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 6 (20.0%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 4 (13.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Neo Solar Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 20 (66.7%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 10 (33.3%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Neo Solar Power


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [NESE 715-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-715-66thb-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NESE 710-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-710-66thb-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [NESE 705-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-705-66thb-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NESE 700-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-700-66thb-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NESE 695-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-695-66thb-g12) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NESE 675-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-675-66mht-g12) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [NESE 670-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-670-66mht-g12) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NESE 665-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-665-66mht-g12) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NESE 660-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-660-66mht-g12) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NESE 655-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-655-66mht-g12) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Neo Solar Power are both Asia-based photovoltaic manufacturers, but they diverge sharply in scale, market reach, and financial standing. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 in China and listed on the New York Stock Exchange, has grown into the world's largest solar module manufacturer, with a stated production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce exceeding 33,800 employees. It holds Tier 1 bankable status, confirming its financial credibility with lenders and project finance institutions globally. Neo Solar Power, founded one year earlier in 2005 in Taiwan, is a considerably smaller and more regionally focused player - it does not hold Tier 1 status and its current product catalog comprises just 30 panel models, compared to Jinko's 545. Originally among the top ten global solar cell producers by capacity, NSP has since merged into United Renewable Energy Co. but continues to market its own branded modules. Jinko's NYSE listing and consistent PVEL Top Performer recognition over more than a decade further reinforce its position as a tier-one global supplier, while NSP operates with a lower public profile and more limited independent performance validation.

Both manufacturers center their portfolios on TOPCon cell technology, though Neo Solar Power has a significantly higher share of TOPCon in its lineup - 66.7% versus 39.4% for Jinko. NSP also carries a much higher proportion of bifacial panels at 66.7%, compared to Jinko's 31.9%, making its catalog particularly well suited to ground-mount installations where rear-side irradiance contributes to energy yield. Jinko leads on peak module efficiency at 24.8% versus NSP's 23.03%, and its average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C is marginally better than NSP's -0.320%/°C, an advantage in high-temperature climates. In practical terms, Jinko's breadth of portfolio - with modules reaching 735 Wp and an average product warranty of 28.5 years - positions it well across residential rooftop installs, utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications worldwide. NSP's bifacial-heavy, TOPCon-forward lineup is more narrowly optimized for open-field installations where two-sided energy capture is a design priority.

For international buyers selecting between the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice across virtually all project types - its Tier 1 bankable status, NYSE listing, and cumulative global installed base exceeding 300 GW provide strong assurance of long-term supply continuity and product support. Neo Solar Power may appeal to buyers in specific markets with established NSP distribution who prioritize a bifacial-dominant TOPCon portfolio, but the absence of Tier 1 status is a meaningful constraint whenever bank or institutional project financing is involved. Buyers should verify current regional product availability and warranty service terms before committing to either brand.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Neo Solar Power](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-neo-solar-power)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Neo Solar Power](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-neo-solar-power)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Neo Solar Power](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-neo-solar-power)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-neo-solar-power

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.