---
title: "Jinko Solar vs NeMo - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs NeMo solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-nemo"
---

# Jinko Solar vs NeMo

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | NeMo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Germany |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Chemnitz |
| Founded | 2006 | 2001 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 100-500 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 0.5-1 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.heckertsolar.com](https://www.heckertsolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

NeMo is the flagship solar module product line of Heckert Solar GmbH, a German photovoltaic manufacturer founded in Chemnitz, Saxony. The company produces mono- and polycrystalline solar panels exclusively in Germany, across facilities in Chemnitz and Langenwetzendorf in Thuringia. With over 20 years of manufacturing...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | NeMo | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | NeMo | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | NeMo | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | NeMo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | NeMo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | NeMo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and NeMo represent two fundamentally different positions within the global solar PV industry. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China with a listing on the New York Stock Exchange, ranks among the world's largest PV module manufacturers - boasting an annual production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status, independently verified, making it a standard reference for project finance in utility-scale and commercial developments worldwide. Its portfolio spans 545 panel models, reaching a peak output of 735 Wp per module and a maximum efficiency of 24.8%, with TOPCon cell technology leading the range at close to 40% of the catalogue. NeMo is the flagship module brand of Heckert Solar, a German manufacturer based in Chemnitz, in operation since 2001. With 100 to 500 employees and an estimated annual production capacity of 0.5 to 1 GW, NeMo operates at a premium niche scale, producing 100% of its modules in Germany using locally sourced components and renewable energy from its own PV installations.

Jinko Solar's broad and technically advanced portfolio makes it a natural fit for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial C&I installations, and any application where bankability and long-term degradation assurance are critical. Its bifacial panel share of nearly 32% of the range, combined with the low degradation characteristics of N-type TOPCon cells and an average product warranty exceeding 28 years, supports long-horizon investment cases. NeMo targets residential rooftop systems and small-to-medium commercial installations where European manufacturing credentials, mechanical robustness - panels in the range are rated for snow loads up to 5,400 Pa - and proximity of after-sales support carry significant weight for end customers and installers alike.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision comes down to project scale and buyer priorities. Jinko Solar is the clear choice for large-volume procurement, utility or C&I projects requiring bankable, high-efficiency panels at competitive cost. NeMo suits buyers in European markets - particularly Germany and neighbouring countries - who serve premium residential clients willing to pay for verified local manufacturing, shorter supply chains, and a strong sustainability narrative rooted in genuine European production.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs NeMo](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-nemo)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs NeMo](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-nemo)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs NeMo](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-nemo)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-nemo

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.