---
title: "Jinko Solar vs MWG - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs MWG solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-mwg"
---

# Jinko Solar vs MWG

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 2 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | MWG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Poland |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Zabrze |
| Founded | 2006 | 2005 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://mwpower.pl](https://mwpower.pl) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

MW Power is a Polish brand operating under MPL Group, offering a range of technology products including photovoltaic panels sold under the MW Green Power (MWG) brand. Their solar modules are small-wattage units (10W–100W) made from monocrystalline silicon, primarily intended for autonomous and off-grid energy systems...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | MWG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 2 | +635 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 400 W | +335 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 370 W | +153 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | MWG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 20.12% | +4.68 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 19.72% | +2.46 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | MWG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.390%/°C | +0.086 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | MWG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | MWG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | MWG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 2 (100.0%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, MWG


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MWG-400M](https://comparepv.com/panel/mwg-mwg-400m) | 400 | 19.3 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MWG-340M](https://comparepv.com/panel/mwg-mwg-340m) | 340 | 20.1 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and MWG represent vastly different scales of operation in the solar PV industry. Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 in China and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). It holds Tier 1 bankable status and employs over 33,800 people globally, with a module production capacity of 130 GW per year - making it the world's leading solar module manufacturer by shipment volume. In the first three quarters of 2025, the company shipped 61.9 GW of modules and became the first manufacturer to cumulatively deliver over 370 GW worldwide. MWG, by contrast, is a Polish company founded in 2005 that does not hold Tier 1 bankable status and has no publicly available panel performance data, suggesting it operates at a much smaller, likely regional, scale.

Jinko Solar's product portfolio spans 545 panel models, with maximum module power reaching 735 Wp and peak efficiency of 24.8%, driven primarily by its N-type TOPCon cell technology. The Tiger Neo series features low temperature coefficients (averaging -0.308% per degree Celsius), high bifaciality across a significant share of the range, and average product warranties exceeding 28 years. This breadth makes Jinko suitable for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount systems equally well. Jinko has also been a PVEL Top Performer for 11 consecutive years, reinforcing manufacturing consistency. MWG, with no panel data available in industry databases and no Tier 1 rating, appears to serve a narrower local or regional niche, but the absence of verifiable technical specifications makes direct product comparison impossible.

For international buyers or Polish installers evaluating these two brands, Jinko Solar offers a well-documented, bankable product with global service infrastructure and a proven track record at every system scale. MWG's suitability cannot be objectively assessed without current technical datasheets and independent performance validation - buyers should request verified product documentation directly from the manufacturer before committing to a project.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs MWG](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-mwg)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs MWG](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-mwg)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs MWG](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-mwg)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-mwg

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.