---
title: "Jinko Solar vs MSolar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs MSolar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-msolar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs MSolar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 5 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | MSolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Shanghai |  |
| Founded | 2006 |  |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |  |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | MSolar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 5 | +632 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 370 W | +365 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 360 W | +163 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | MSolar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 19.80% | +5.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 19.27% | +2.91 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | MSolar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.360%/°C | +0.056 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | MSolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | MSolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | MSolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, MSolar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MS-370M](https://comparepv.com/panel/msolar-ms-370m) | 370 | 19.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MS-365M](https://comparepv.com/panel/msolar-ms-365m) | 365 | 19.5 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MS-360M](https://comparepv.com/panel/msolar-ms-360m) | 360 | 19.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MS-355M](https://comparepv.com/panel/msolar-ms-355m) | 355 | 19.0 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MS-350M](https://comparepv.com/panel/msolar-ms-350m) | 350 | 18.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 in China and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), making it one of the most visible and financially transparent solar manufacturers globally. With a declared production capacity of 130 GW, a workforce exceeding 33,800 employees, and Tier 1 (bankable) status, Jinko operates at a scale few manufacturers can match - the company reports that one in every seven solar panels installed globally is a Jinko product, and its Tiger Neo TOPCon series alone has surpassed 200 GW in cumulative shipments. Jinko has also earned 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer, underscoring consistent manufacturing quality. MSolar, by contrast, is a small American company based in San Antonio that imports solar panels; it offers just five models, holds no Tier 1 bankable status, and its manufacturing origin and cell technology are undocumented, raising questions about long-term supply reliability.

Jinko Solar's portfolio of 545 panel models covers a broad performance range, with an average power output of approximately 511 Wp, maximum efficiency of 24.8%, and an average temperature coefficient of -0.31%/°C - better than many industry peers. Around 32% of its lineup is bifacial, and the average product warranty stands at approximately 28.5 years. This breadth makes Jinko well suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial (C&I) rooftop installations, and bank-financed schemes where Tier 1 status is a prerequisite. MSolar's five modules reach a maximum of 370 Wp and 19.8% peak efficiency, with an average temperature coefficient of -0.36%/°C and no bifacial options - a profile that limits the brand to simple residential rooftop installs where upfront cost is the primary driver and long-term bankability is not a concern.

For international buyers selecting between the two, Jinko Solar is the clear default across virtually all project types and financing scenarios. Its scale, TOPCon technology leadership, and Tier 1 recognition provide the risk mitigation that lenders, EPCs, and large offtakers require. MSolar may appeal only to price-sensitive residential buyers making small-scale purchases without external financing, though its unclear technology pedigree, limited product range, and uncertain company status remain significant drawbacks even in that context.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs MSolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-msolar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs MSolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-msolar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs MSolar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-msolar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-msolar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.