---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Mission Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Mission Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-mission-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Mission Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 24 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Mission Solar leans bifacial (75% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | United States |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | San Antonio |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.missionsolar.com](https://www.missionsolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Mission Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 24 | +613 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 670 W | +65 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 554 W | +31 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Mission Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.00% | +1.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 22.11% | +0.07 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Mission Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.313%/°C | +0.009 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 18 (75%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +0.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 2 (8.3%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 7 (29.2%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 13 (54.2%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 2 (8.3%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 6 (25.0%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 12 (50.0%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 6 (25.0%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (38%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 6 (25.0%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 9 (37.5%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 9 (37.5%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Mission Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MST12670HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12670hp3g) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MST12665HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12665hp3g) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MST12660HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12660hp3g) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MST12R620HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r620hn3g) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MST12R615HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r615hn3g) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [MST12R610HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r610hn3g) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MSH10-595HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-595hn4g) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MSI10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.9 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [MSH10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MSI10-585HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-585hn4g) | 585 | 22.7 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, with an annual module production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,830 employees. The company is listed on the NYSE and holds Tier 1 (bankable) status with leading financial institutions, enabling straightforward project financing across global markets. Its portfolio spans 545 panel models, reaching a maximum output of 735 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 24.8%, driven by its flagship TOPCon technology which accounts for 39.4% of the lineup. Mission Solar, by contrast, is a smaller American manufacturer founded in 2014 and based in San Antonio, Texas. It does not hold Tier 1 status and operates a focused portfolio of just 24 models, but has carved out a domestic niche through its American-made manufacturing, eligibility for the U.S. federal domestic content tax credit bonus, and tariff immunity - factors that carry significant weight in the current U.S. policy environment.

Jinko Solar's broad and diverse portfolio makes it a strong contender across all installation segments. An average panel efficiency of 22.0%, an average power output of 511 Wp, and a bifacial share of 31.9% cover the needs of space-constrained residential rooftop installs, large commercial C&I projects, and utility-scale ground-mount deployments alike. The average temperature coefficient of Pmax at -0.308%/°C and an average warranty of approximately 28.5 years round out a mature, well-documented product offer. Mission Solar's more compact lineup punches above its weight in certain technical areas: its average power output of 553.75 Wp exceeds Jinko's portfolio average, its bifacial module share of 75% is substantially higher, and its maximum efficiency reaches 23%. These characteristics make Mission Solar panels well-suited for U.S. residential and commercial installations where bifacial ground-mount configurations and domestic content incentives are priorities. The average warranty of 28.75 years is slightly longer than Jinko's, and the temperature coefficient of -0.313%/°C is broadly comparable.

For international buyers selecting between the two, the decision hinges primarily on geography and project financing requirements. Jinko Solar's Tier 1 status, 130 GW production capacity, and global distribution network make it the default choice for any project requiring bankability, large-volume procurement, or broad service coverage - including European markets. Mission Solar is best positioned for U.S.-based buyers who prioritize domestically manufactured modules and the associated policy benefits, but its limited Tier 1 standing and narrow panel catalog make it a less practical option for buyers outside North America or for projects that depend on institutional financing.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Mission Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-mission-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Mission Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-mission-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Mission Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-mission-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-mission-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.