---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Miolentek - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Miolentek solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-miolentek"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Miolentek

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Miolentek |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Shenzhen |
| Founded | 2006 | 2015 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 200 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://www.miolentek.com](http://www.miolentek.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Shenzhen Mioulong Technology Co., Ltd. (Miolentek) focuses on designing, researching, developing, manufacturing, and selling various solar panels including PET, ETFE, epoxy, and glass solar panels. They offer OEM/ODM services and release new products monthly to meet market trends. The company operates in-house...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Miolentek | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Miolentek | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Miolentek | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Miolentek |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Miolentek |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Miolentek |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Miolentek are both Chinese solar manufacturers, but they operate in entirely different market segments and should not be considered direct competitors. Jinko Solar was founded in 2006, is listed on the NYSE, and has grown into one of the world's largest PV module producers, with a module production capacity of 130 GW per year and shipments of 93 GW in 2024 - representing roughly 13% of the global market. The company employs over 33,000 people and holds Tier 1 bankable status, achieving a 100% bankability rating from BloombergNEF. Miolentek, operating under Shenzhen Mioulong Technology Co., Ltd. and founded in 2015, is a small niche manufacturer with approximately 200 employees. Its product line consists exclusively of compact and flexible panels ranging from 0.08 W to around 120 W - including ETFE, epoxy, and semi-flexible formats - aimed primarily at OEM customers and specialty low-power applications rather than the mainstream PV installation market.

Jinko Solar's Tiger Neo series, built on N-type TOPCon cell technology, delivers module efficiencies up to 24.8% and power outputs up to 735 Wp, with an average efficiency of approximately 22% across its portfolio of 545 modules. The low average temperature coefficient of around -0.308%/degC and a growing share of bifacial modules (approximately 32% of the portfolio) make Jinko panels well-suited for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount arrays. Average product warranties exceed 28 years, which supports project bankability for institutional financing. Miolentek's portfolio addresses a completely separate set of use cases - portable solar chargers, marine and recreational vehicle power, off-grid consumer electronics, and OEM product integration - with no products designed for standard rooftop or ground-mount PV systems.

For international buyers evaluating the two companies for mainstream solar installations, Jinko Solar is the clear and only applicable choice. It offers a full-scale, bankable, high-efficiency module portfolio with global supply chain support and a proven track record across residential, commercial, and utility segments. Miolentek serves a specialized niche of small-format and flexible panels and should only be considered by buyers specifically seeking low-wattage OEM or portable solar solutions - it is not a substitute for conventional PV module suppliers.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Miolentek](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-miolentek)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Miolentek](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-miolentek)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Miolentek](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-miolentek)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-miolentek

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.