---
title: "Jinko Solar vs MicroQuanta - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs MicroQuanta solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-microquanta"
---

# Jinko Solar vs MicroQuanta

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | MicroQuanta |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Hangzhou |
| Founded | 2006 | 2015 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 39 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://www.microquanta.com](http://www.microquanta.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Microquanta Semiconductor is a developer and manufacturer of perovskite solar cell modules created to provide clean energy. The company's perovskite photovoltaic modules feature high energy conversion efficiency, offering business clients flexible clean energy solutions. Microquanta is a global pioneer in perovskite...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | MicroQuanta | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | MicroQuanta | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | MicroQuanta | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | MicroQuanta |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | MicroQuanta |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | MicroQuanta |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and MicroQuanta represent two vastly different tiers of the Chinese solar PV industry. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is consistently ranked as the world's number one solar module manufacturer by shipment volume, with 93 GW shipped in 2024 and a total module production capacity of 130 GW. The company employs over 33,800 people and has held Tier 1 bankability status according to Bloomberg NEF for ten consecutive years - earning 100% bankability recognition in the 2024 survey, a distinction no other manufacturer has achieved. MicroQuanta, by contrast, was founded in 2015 and employs just 39 people. It is a niche pioneer in perovskite photovoltaics, a third-generation thin-film technology fundamentally different from the crystalline silicon modules produced by Jinko. With only 6 panel models in its portfolio, a maximum output of 160 Wp, and no Tier 1 or bankability status, MicroQuanta operates at a fraction of Jinko's commercial footprint and market reach.

Jinko Solar's portfolio of 545 module models, led by its N-type TOPCon Tiger Neo series, covers virtually every commercial use case: residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) rooftop projects, and large-scale utility ground-mount installations. Its flagship panels reach up to 735 Wp and 24.8% efficiency, with an average product warranty of over 28 years and a temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C - well suited to varying climates across European markets. MicroQuanta's perovskite modules, reaching up to 20.24% efficiency and 160 Wp, are targeted at BIPV (building-integrated photovoltaics) and research or demonstration projects. The company built the world's first large-area perovskite production line and obtained VDE certification, but its commercial reach and supply reliability remain very limited compared to established silicon module makers.

For international buyers sourcing panels for standard projects - whether residential, C&I, or utility-scale - Jinko Solar is the considerably safer and more practical choice, backed by proven technology, a global supply chain, and robust warranty infrastructure. MicroQuanta offers genuine technological innovation in the perovskite space and is relevant for BIPV architects, research institutions, or early-adopter developers willing to engage with an emerging technology that carries higher commercialization risk alongside meaningful long-term upside potential.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs MicroQuanta](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-microquanta)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs MicroQuanta](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-microquanta)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs MicroQuanta](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-microquanta)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-microquanta

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.