---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Maxeon - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Maxeon solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-maxeon"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Maxeon

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 36 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Maxeon leans bifacial (53% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Maxeon |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Singapore |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Singapore |
| Founded | 2006 | 2020 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | NASDAQ: MAXN |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.maxeon.com](https://www.maxeon.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Maxeon | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 36 | +601 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 555 W | +180 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 444 W | +79 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Maxeon | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.00% | +0.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.36% | +0.82 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Maxeon | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.294%/°C | +0.011 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 19 (53%) | +17 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 31.4 yrs | +2.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Maxeon |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 7 (19.4%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 4 (11.1%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 8 (22.2%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 14 (38.9%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 3 (8.3%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Maxeon |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 7 (19.4%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 17 (47.2%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 12 (33.3%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (42%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Maxeon |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 12 (33.3%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 7 (19.4%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 0 | 15 (41.7%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 2 (5.6%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Maxeon


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SPR-P7-555-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-555-com-s) | 555 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SPR-P7-550-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-550-com-s) | 550 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SPR-P7-545-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-545-com-s) | 545 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SPR-P7-540-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-540-com-s) | 540 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SPR-P7-535-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-535-com-s) | 535 | 21.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SPR-P7-530-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-530-com-s) | 530 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SPR-P6-525-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-525-upp) | 525 | 20.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SPR-P6-520-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-520-upp) | 520 | 20.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SPR-P6-515-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-515-upp) | 515 | 19.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SPR-P6-510-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-510-upp) | 510 | 19.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar, founded in China in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, ranks among the largest solar module manufacturers in the world by shipped volume. With a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of more than 33,000 employees, the company offers unmatched supply reliability and the kind of global logistics infrastructure that large-scale buyers depend on. Its portfolio spans 545 panel models and carries Tier 1 bankable status. Maxeon, headquartered in Singapore and listed on NASDAQ, was spun off from SunPower in 2020 and takes a deliberately narrower approach: a focused catalog of just 36 models targeting the premium end of the market. Despite its youth and smaller scale, Maxeon holds Tier 1 bankable status and has built its reputation on cell-level engineering excellence, offering an average product warranty of 31.4 years across its portfolio - with select product lines backed by 40-year coverage, among the longest commitments available in the industry.

Jinko Solar's technology foundation rests on n-type TOPCon cells, which represent nearly 40% of its lineup and drive a maximum module efficiency of 24.8%, with an average across the full portfolio of 22.0%. The company is an active R&D leader, having set successive cell-level efficiency records in TOPCon technology. Its breadth of product - ranging from residential rooftop panels to high-power bifacial modules with outputs up to 735 Wp - makes it a natural fit for utility-scale ground-mount farms and large commercial C&I projects where cost-per-watt, volume availability, and bankability are the primary procurement criteria. Maxeon differentiates itself through its proprietary Back Contact (IBC) cell architecture, which places all electrical contacts on the rear of the cell, eliminating front-side shading losses and reducing hotspot formation risk under partial shade. With more than 52% of its portfolio bifacial and a slightly more favorable average temperature coefficient of -0.294%/°C compared to Jinko's -0.308%/°C, Maxeon modules are particularly well suited to space-constrained residential rooftops, installations with shading challenges, and premium projects where long-term yield predictability justifies a higher upfront module cost.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision follows a clear logic. Jinko Solar is the stronger candidate for utility-scale developers, commercial integrators, and cost-driven residential programs that need broad product availability, proven bankability, and competitive pricing at scale. Maxeon makes the more compelling case for premium residential deployments, rooftops where panel count is limited, or discerning end-customers who place high value on shade resilience, temperature performance, and the longest available warranty coverage - at a premium price point that reflects the engineering advantage behind its IBC platform.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Maxeon](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-maxeon)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Maxeon](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-maxeon)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Maxeon](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-maxeon)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-maxeon

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.