---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Leapton - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Leapton solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-leapton"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Leapton

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 119 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Leapton leans bifacial (49% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Leapton |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Japan |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Kobe |
| Founded | 2006 | 2012 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 3+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://www.leaptonpv.com/](http://www.leaptonpv.com/) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Leapton Energy, headquartered in Japan, is a global leader in the solar PV industry, specializing in Tier-1 solar modules, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and inverters. With over 10 years of experience, Leapton Energy's products are now available in more than 70 countries worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Leapton | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 119 | +518 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 720 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 546 W | +24 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Leapton | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.32% | +1.48 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 22.18% | +0.00 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Leapton | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.307%/°C | +0.002 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 58 (49%) | +12 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +0.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Leapton |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 5 (4.2%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 32 (26.9%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 74 (62.2%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 8 (6.7%) |


## Power distribution

Leapton offers more 600W+ panels (32% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Leapton |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 48 (40.3%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 33 (27.7%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 28 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 10 (8.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Leapton |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 105 (88.2%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 14 (11.8%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Leapton


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Leapton are both Tier 1 bankable solar panel manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global PV market. Founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, Jinko Solar is listed on the NYSE and operates at a production capacity of 130 GW, employing over 33,800 people - making it one of the largest module manufacturers in the world, with approximately 41 GW shipped in the first half of 2025 alone. Leapton, headquartered in Japan with manufacturing based in China, was founded in 2012 and reports a production capacity of 3+ GW. While considerably smaller in scale, Leapton has steadily expanded its presence across more than 70 countries, positioning itself as a quality-focused, competitively priced Tier 1 alternative to the industry giants. Both companies have achieved Tier 1 bankability, giving project financiers confidence in either brand for long-term performance guarantees.

On the technology front, both manufacturers have committed strongly to N-type TOPCon cell technology, though Leapton's portfolio is more deeply concentrated in it - 88.2% of its panel range uses TOPCon versus approximately 39.4% for Jinko. Jinko's broader portfolio reaches a higher maximum output of 735 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 24.8%, backed by laboratory cell efficiency records exceeding 27%. Leapton's top module reaches 720 Wp and 23.32% efficiency, but its portfolio shows a higher average bifacial ratio (48.7% versus 31.9% for Jinko) and a slightly longer average product warranty of around 29.5 years compared to Jinko's 28.5 years. Jinko is the stronger candidate for large-scale utility and commercial C&I projects where supply chain depth, consistent batch quality, and brand recognition with lenders matter most. Leapton's high bifacial share and TOPCon-focused lineup make it a compelling option for residential rooftop installs and ground-mount systems where bifacial energy yield is a key design parameter.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar offers the reassurance of unmatched scale, a decade-long track record of PVEL Top Performer results, and straightforward access through established distribution networks across Europe and beyond. Leapton represents a solid value-oriented choice - particularly for installers seeking a nearly all-TOPCon bifacial portfolio with strong warranty terms at a more accessible price point. The right choice depends on project size and risk appetite: Jinko for volume and bankability confidence, Leapton for efficient niche deployment where bifacial TOPCon performance and cost-efficiency are the priority.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Leapton](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-leapton)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Leapton](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-leapton)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Leapton](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-leapton)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-leapton

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.