---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Kyocera - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Kyocera solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-kyocera"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Kyocera

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 8 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Kyocera |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Japan |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Kyoto |
| Founded | 2006 | 1959 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 77,136 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | TYO: 6971 |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://global.kyocera.com](https://global.kyocera.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Kyocera | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 8 | +629 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 410 W | +325 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 302 W | +221 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Kyocera | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 21.00% | +3.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 18.21% | +3.97 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Kyocera | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.460%/°C | +0.156 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Kyocera |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 5 (62.5%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 1 (12.5%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 2 (25.0%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Kyocera |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 6 (75.0%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 2 (25.0%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Kyocera |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 8 (100.0%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Kyocera


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [KT410W-108HL4](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [KT410W-108HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4b) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [KK280P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk280p-3cd3cg) | 280 | 17.0 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 4 | [KK275P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk275p-3cd3cg) | 275 | 16.7 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 5 | [KU270-6MCA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mca) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline |
| 6 | [KU270-6MPA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mpa) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline |
| 7 | [KK270P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk270p-3cd3cg) | 270 | 16.4 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 8 | [KT230W-60HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt230w-60hl4b) | 230 | 20.8 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Kyocera represent fundamentally different positions in the global solar PV market. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, has grown into the world's largest solar panel manufacturer, with a production capacity of 130 GW and confirmed Tier 1 bankable status that streamlines project financing worldwide. Listed on the NYSE and employing over 33,800 people, the company maintains an extensive portfolio of 545 modules, with maximum efficiency reaching 24.8% and an average of 22%, anchored by N-type TOPCon cell technology. Kyocera, by contrast, is a Japanese industrial conglomerate founded in 1959 for which solar is one segment among many - its current catalog comprises only 8 modules, average efficiency stands at 18.21%, no bifacial products are offered, and the company lacks Tier 1 bankable status. Kyocera ceased North American solar sales operations in 2016, significantly limiting its geographic reach in Western markets.

Jinko Solar's portfolio breadth is a key competitive advantage: TOPCon cells account for nearly 40% of its lineup, 31.9% of modules are bifacial, the average temperature coefficient is a favorable -0.31%/°C, and the maximum output reaches 735 Wp. This versatility makes Jinko equally well suited to residential rooftop installs, utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications. The company has also earned PVEL Top Performer recognition for eleven consecutive years (2015-2025), underscoring manufacturing consistency at scale. Kyocera's primary strength lies in its documented long-term durability - internal data from its Sakura facility records only 17.2% total degradation after more than 36 years of operation - but its narrow eight-panel catalog, absence of bifacial technology, and weaker temperature coefficient of -0.46%/°C confine it to niche use cases such as small off-grid systems or specialty industrial installations where proven longevity matters more than peak performance.

For international buyers choosing between the two for new grid-tied projects, Jinko Solar is the clear selection at any scale, offering modern technology, competitive pricing, strong bankability for project finance, and a product range that covers everything from residential to large ground-mount. Kyocera retains appeal for buyers who place exceptional longevity and brand heritage above leading-edge efficiency, particularly in markets where the company remains active, but its limited current portfolio and older technology stack make it difficult to recommend as a primary module supplier for projects commissioned in 2025.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-kyocera)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-kyocera)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-kyocera)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-kyocera

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.