---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Kensol - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Kensol solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-kensol"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Kensol

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 21 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Kensol leans bifacial (81% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Poland |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Gliwice |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Employees | 33,830 | null |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | null GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://kensol.pl](https://kensol.pl) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Kensol is a Polish company founded in 2014 that focuses on providing innovative, ecological, and economical solutions for the renewable energy sector. They design equipment tailored to the needs of the Polish market, specializing in photovoltaic (PV) and heating (HVAC) systems. Kensol offers modern and integrated...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 21 | +616 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 460 W | +275 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 437 W | +85 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.00% | +1.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 22.04% | +0.13 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.296%/°C | +0.008 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 17 (81%) | +45 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 29.0 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 2 (9.5%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 6 (28.6%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 11 (52.4%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 2 (9.5%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 1 (4.8%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 20 (95.2%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (29%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 5 (23.8%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 6 (28.6%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 2 (9.5%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 8 (38.1%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Kensol


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MNHTR2-BI-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MNHTR2-BI 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460-1) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MNHTR2-BI-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MNHTR2-BI 455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455-1) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MNHTR2-BI-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [KS450MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks450mnhtr3-bi) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MNHTR2-BI 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450-1) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MNHTR2-BI-445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [KS445MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks445mnhtr3-bi) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MNHTR2-BI 445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445-1) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 in China and listed on the NYSE, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, employing over 33,800 people and operating with a stated module production capacity of 130 GW per year. The company has shipped a cumulative total of approximately 370 GW of modules globally and ranks first in global shipments multiple times over. It holds a confirmed Tier 1 bankable status and in BloombergNEF's 2024 PV Module Bankability Survey became the sole manufacturer to achieve a 100% bankability rating - a recognition maintained for ten consecutive years. Kensol, by contrast, is a Polish manufacturer based in Gliwice, established in 2014 and serving primarily the domestic and broader Central European market. With a product portfolio of 21 modules, undisclosed production capacity, and no published employee figures, Kensol operates at a significantly smaller scale. The company holds TÜV Rheinland certification for its panels and provides factory-backed domestic servicing, though it does not appear on Tier 1 bankability lists.

Jinko Solar's portfolio spans 545 modules, with maximum power output reaching 735 Wp and peak module efficiency of 24.8%, driven largely by N-type TOPCon cell technology (representing 39.4% of the portfolio). The company has set world records in TOPCon cell efficiency and has earned eleven consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer. Its deep portfolio, proven bankability, and global supply chain make Jinko the default choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial and industrial installations where financial close, warranty certainty (average 28.5 years), and long-term supplier reliability are critical. Kensol's portfolio tops out at 460 Wp with a maximum module efficiency of 23%, but stands out with an unusually high bifacial share of 80.95% across its range and a marginally favorable average temperature coefficient of -0.296 percent per degree Celsius compared to Jinko's -0.308 percent per degree Celsius. These characteristics make Kensol panels well-suited for residential rooftop installs and agrivoltaic applications in the Polish market, where European provenance and accessible local after-sales support carry increasing practical and regulatory weight.

For buyers choosing between the two, the decision largely hinges on project scale and risk profile. Jinko Solar is the clear choice for utility-scale and bankable commercial projects worldwide, backed by unmatched production depth, R&D investment, and global warranty infrastructure. Kensol is a regionally relevant alternative for smaller residential or commercial projects in Poland and Central Europe, where supply chain proximity, local servicing in the native language, and a fully European product origin - increasingly valued under emerging carbon footprint and content regulations - may provide meaningful advantages over sourcing from a large Asian manufacturer.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-kensol)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-kensol)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-kensol)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-kensol

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.