---
title: "Jinko Solar vs JS Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs JS Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-js-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs JS Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 137 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | JS Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Jinhua |
| Founded | 2006 | 2011 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.jssolar.com](https://www.jssolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | JS Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 137 | +500 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 670 W | +65 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 430 W | +92 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | JS Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.45% | +2.35 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 20.03% | +2.14 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | JS Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.335%/°C | +0.031 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 12 (9%) | +28 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 25.1 yrs | +3.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | JS Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 44 (32.1%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 49 (35.8%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 38 (27.7%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 6 (4.4%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | JS Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 54 (39.4%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 44 (32.1%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 32 (23.4%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 7 (5.1%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (39%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | JS Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 8 (5.8%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 53 (38.7%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 76 (55.5%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, JS Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JS210MHC132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JS210MHC132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JS210MHC132-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JS210MHC132-655](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JS210MHC132-650](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JS210MHC120-605](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-605) | 605 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JS210MHC120-600](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-600) | 600 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JS210MHC120-595](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-595) | 595 | 21.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JS210MHC120-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-590) | 590 | 20.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JS210MHC120-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-585) | 585 | 20.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and JS Solar are both Chinese solar PV manufacturers, but they occupy vastly different positions in the global market. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE (ticker: JKS), is the world's largest solar panel manufacturer by shipment volume, having delivered 92.9 GW of modules in 2024 alone and surpassing 300 GW of cumulative global installations across more than 190 countries. With a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce exceeding 33,800 employees, Jinko holds Tier 1 bankable status and was ranked the most bankable solar module company in BloombergNEF's 2024 PV Module Bankability Survey - the only manufacturer to achieve a 100% bankability rating that year. JS Solar, founded in 2011 and headquartered in Wuxi, Jiangsu province, is a considerably smaller manufacturer without Tier 1 status. While its products carry internationally recognized certifications (CE, IEC 61215, IEC 61730) and are exported to over 100 countries, JS Solar does not match Jinko's scale, financial standing, or global market visibility.

On the technology and product portfolio front, Jinko Solar leads decisively. Its flagship Tiger Neo series employs N-type TOPCon cell technology, achieving a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and a peak output of 735 Wp - both well ahead of JS Solar's best figures of 22.45% efficiency and 670 Wp. The average efficiency across Jinko's 545-panel portfolio stands at 22.0%, compared to 20.0% across JS Solar's 137-panel lineup. Jinko's average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C outperforms JS Solar's -0.335%/°C, indicating better real-world power retention under elevated operating temperatures. Bifacial panels account for nearly 32% of Jinko's portfolio, making it well-suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects where rear-side irradiance delivers meaningful yield gains. Jinko's product breadth and bankability make it a strong fit for large commercial C&I projects and utility-scale developments where lender approval is required. JS Solar's more modest portfolio can serve residential rooftop installations and smaller commercial projects in cost-sensitive markets where Tier 1 status is not a prerequisite.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk option across virtually all project scales and market segments. Its Tier 1 status, longer average product warranty (28.5 years versus 25.1 years for JS Solar), proven manufacturing consistency backed by over a decade of top-performer rankings, and a global service network all reduce long-term operational risk. JS Solar may appeal to price-sensitive buyers for straightforward residential installations, but the absence of Tier 1 bankability limits its suitability for projects requiring institutional financing or rigorous long-term performance guarantees.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs JS Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-js-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs JS Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-js-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs JS Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-js-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-js-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.