---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Jolywood - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Jolywood solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-jolywood"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Jolywood

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 128 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Taizhou |
| Founded | 2006 | 2008 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | SZSE: 300393 |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.jolywood.cn](https://www.jolywood.cn) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 128 | +509 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 715 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 554 W | +31 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.60% | +1.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 22.54% | +0.37 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.284%/°C | +0.020 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 110 (86%) | +50 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 11 (8.6%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 89 (69.5%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 28 (21.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 42 (32.8%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 38 (29.7%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 40 (31.2%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 8 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 122 (95.3%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 6 (4.7%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jolywood


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JW-HD132N-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JW-HD132N-695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), is one of the largest solar panel manufacturers in the world, with a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees. Its global reach and long track record - including eleven consecutive years of Top Performer recognition from PVEL (2015-2025) - make it a dominant Tier 1 name across all major markets. Jolywood, founded in 2008 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), is a more focused, niche player that was among the pioneers of commercial N-type TOPCon cell production. While smaller in scale and offering a portfolio of 128 models compared to Jinko's 545, Jolywood has built a reputation as a technology-forward manufacturer and earned its own Top Performer recognition from Kiwa PVEL in 2025.

Jolywood's portfolio is heavily concentrated on TOPCon technology (95.3% of its lineup) and bifacial modules (85.9%), resulting in a higher average module power of 553.6 Wp and a better average temperature coefficient of -0.284%/°C compared to Jinko's -0.308%/°C. These characteristics make Jolywood a strong fit for ground-mounted utility-scale projects and flat-roof commercial installations, where bifacial energy gain and low thermal losses directly drive annual yield. Its 30-year performance warranty also exceeds Jinko's portfolio average of 28.5 years. Jinko Solar, by contrast, offers a far broader range covering both mono-facial and bifacial applications, with a maximum module power of 735 Wp and a leading maximum efficiency of 24.8% in its Tiger Neo series. This versatility makes Jinko well-suited to residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and large-scale utility deployments - particularly where brand recognition, installer support networks, and bankability are decisive criteria.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision largely reflects project type and risk profile. Jinko Solar's scale, extensive distribution network, and long reliability record make it a lower-risk choice for diverse and mixed portfolios. Jolywood is the stronger option for buyers specifically targeting high-efficiency bifacial ground-mount systems, where its deep TOPCon specialization, superior temperature coefficient, and longer warranty can deliver measurable performance advantages over the system lifetime.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jolywood)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jolywood)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jolywood)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-jolywood

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.