---
title: "Jinko Solar vs DAH Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs DAH Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-dah-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs DAH Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 363 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | DAH Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Hefei |
| Founded | 2006 | 2009 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | null |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | DAH Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 363 | +274 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 725 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 520 W | +2 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | DAH Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.34% | +1.46 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 22.10% | +0.07 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | DAH Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.299%/°C | +0.006 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 316 (87%) | +51 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 29.4 yrs | +0.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | DAH Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 10 (2.8%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 22 (6.1%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 86 (23.7%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 217 (59.8%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 28 (7.7%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | DAH Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 8 (2.2%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 161 (44.4%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 113 (31.1%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 71 (19.6%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 10 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | DAH Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 319 (87.9%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 44 (12.1%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, DAH Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar and Jinko Solar are both China-based, Tier 1 bankable photovoltaic module manufacturers, yet they occupy very different positions in the global market. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and publicly traded on the NYSE, is the world's largest solar panel manufacturer by shipment volume, with a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees - shipping over 60 GW in 2025 alone and holding approximately 13% of the global module market. DAH Solar, founded in 2009 in Hefei, China, operates at a significantly smaller scale with a production capacity of 10 GW and more than 2,000 employees. Despite the size difference, DAH Solar has maintained its Tier 1 BNEF bankability status and distributes products to over 120 countries, with Europe and Latin America as its primary export markets. Both companies center their technology roadmap on TOPCon cell architecture, but the depth and composition of their portfolios differ considerably.

DAH Solar has built 79.6% of its 363-panel lineup around TOPCon and offers a notably high 87.1% share of bifacial modules, making it particularly well-suited for ground-mount utility-scale and commercial C&I installations where rear-side irradiance gains directly improve energy yield. Its average module efficiency stands at 22.10% with a maximum of 23.34%, and the average product warranty reaches 29.4 years - competitive even against premium-tier brands. DAH Solar's proprietary Full-Screen frameless technology, recognized by TÜV Nord with an Outdoor Field Performance Award, further differentiates the product for buyers focused on minimizing soiling losses and reducing long-term maintenance costs. Jinko Solar, with 545 panel models, a maximum efficiency of 24.8%, and a peak power output of 735 Wp, offers the broadest and most flexible portfolio of the two, covering everything from residential rooftop installs to large utility-scale ground-mount projects. Its TOPCon share stands at 39.4% of the portfolio, while bifacial modules represent 31.9% of the range, reflecting a deliberately diversified lineup that serves cost-sensitive segments as well as high-performance applications.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk, higher-availability option - backed by an established global supply chain, an extensive distributor network, and 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer. DAH Solar is a compelling alternative for project developers prioritizing bifacial ground-mount performance and longer warranty terms, particularly in European utility-scale and C&I segments where its technology differentiation and confirmed Tier 1 bankability offer a credible value proposition at a scale below the largest tier of global suppliers.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs DAH Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-dah-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs DAH Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-dah-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs DAH Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-dah-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-dah-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.