--- title: "Jinergy vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Jinergy vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-trina-solar" --- # Jinergy vs Trina Solar Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 10 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. ## The two companies | Attribute | Jinergy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | | Changzhou | | Founded | 2014 | 1997 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.jinergy.com](https://www.jinergy.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Jinergy | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 10 | 340 | +330 | | Max Power | 510 W | 760 W | +250 W | | Avg Power | 478 W | 520 W | +43 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Jinergy | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.27% | 24.80% | +1.53 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.93% | 21.71% | +0.22 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Jinergy | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.330%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.028 | | Bifacial Share | 5 (50%) | 145 (43%) | +7 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Jinergy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | 20-21% | 2 (20.0%) | 57 (16.8%) | | 21-22% | 3 (30.0%) | 83 (24.4%) | | 22-23% | 3 (30.0%) | 102 (30.0%) | | 23%+ | 2 (20.0%) | 76 (22.4%) | | \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) | ## Power distribution Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup) | Power band | Jinergy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | 400-499W | 7 (70.0%) | 142 (41.8%) | | 500-599W | 3 (30.0%) | 54 (15.9%) | | \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (50%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%) | Technology | Jinergy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (50.0%) | 75 (22.1%) | | TOPCon | 5 (50.0%) | 248 (72.9%) | | Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) | | N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) | ## Top panels, Jinergy | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [JKL132-B-510MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-510mh) | 510 | 21.5 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [JKL132-B-505MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-505mh) | 505 | 21.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [JKL132-B-500MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-500mh) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [JKL132-B-495MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-495mh) | 495 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [JKL132-B-490MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-490mh) | 490 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [JLSJG-D-465NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-465nb) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [JLSJG-D-460NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-460nb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [JLSJG-D-455NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-455nb) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [JLSJG-D-450NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-450nb) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [JLSJG-D-445NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-445nb) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Trina Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Jinergy is a Chinese solar manufacturer established in 2013 as a subsidiary of Jinneng Holding Group, a state-owned energy conglomerate headquartered in Shanxi Province and one of the world's largest coal enterprises. Backed by this heavyweight parent, Jinergy has secured Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status and built out cell and module manufacturing in Shanxi, though its annual production scale remains in the low single-digit GW range - well below the industry's leading players. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu, is one of the most tenured names in global PV manufacturing. By Q1 2025 it had earned BNEF's unanimous bankability rating for the eighth consecutive time, and its annual module production capacity stands at approximately 100 GW, placing it behind only LONGi and Jinko Solar in global output. By any institutional measure - years in market, cumulative shipments exceeding 292 GW, and depth of project-finance acceptance - Trina Solar carries the considerably stronger footprint. Jinergy's commercial portfolio is anchored in HJT (heterojunction) technology, which the company commercialized as early as 2017, complemented by PERC mono-crystalline and N-type TOPCon modules. HJT cells offer strong low-light and temperature performance, making them attractive for rooftop applications in less sunny climates, though Jinergy's HJT modules rank around 21.85% efficiency in current industry listings - below the leading edge of the market. The brand has found traction in India, Japan, and Latin America but its residential and utility product families are less comprehensively documented than those of larger rivals. Trina Solar, by contrast, offers a clearly segmented lineup across all three major use cases: the Vertex S+ G3 series targets residential and light commercial rooftops with modules up to 485 W at efficiencies reaching 24.3%, the Vertex N family addresses commercial and industrial projects at outputs around 670 W, and the NEG-series bifacial TOPCon modules reach up to 760 W at 24.5% efficiency for utility-scale ground-mount installations. All three product lines are built on n-type TOPCon cell technology, which has become the de facto mainstream for 2025 procurement. For most international buyers - whether procuring for rooftop systems, commercial arrays, or large-scale tenders - Trina Solar is the more straightforward default. Its longer track record, substantially larger manufacturing base, and unbroken BNEF Tier 1 record give it considerably stronger traction with project financiers, EPCs, and insurance underwriters worldwide. Jinergy is a credible option: state-owned backing, Tier 1 status, and a differentiated HJT offering make it a reasonable consideration for niche applications. The two brands are not, however, interchangeable in institutional weight - Trina Solar's infrastructure advantage is material, particularly wherever module bankability needs to be established quickly with lenders. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Jinergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar) - [Jinergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar) - [Jinergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-trina-solar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.