---
title: "Jinergy vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinergy vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-q-cells"
---

# Jinergy vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 10 models). Jinergy leads on peak efficiency at 23.27%. Jinergy leans bifacial (50% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinergy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters |  | Seoul |
| Founded | 2014 | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.jinergy.com](https://www.jinergy.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinergy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 10 | 89 | +79 |
| Max Power | 510 W | 675 W | +165 W |
| Avg Power | 478 W | 468 W | +9 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinergy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.27% | 23.20% | +0.07 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.93% | 21.21% | +0.72 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinergy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.330%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.005 |
| Bifacial Share | 5 (50%) | 35 (39%) | +11 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +3.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinergy skews to higher efficiency: 20% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinergy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 2 (20.0%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (30.0%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 3 (30.0%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (20.0%) | 2 (2.2%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinergy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 7 (70.0%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 3 (30.0%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (50%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Jinergy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 5 (50.0%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| TOPCon | 5 (50.0%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, Jinergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKL132-B-510MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-510mh) | 510 | 21.5 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKL132-B-505MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-505mh) | 505 | 21.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKL132-B-500MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-500mh) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKL132-B-495MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-495mh) | 495 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKL132-B-490MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-490mh) | 490 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JLSJG-D-465NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-465nb) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JLSJG-D-460NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-460nb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JLSJG-D-455NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-455nb) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JLSJG-D-450NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-450nb) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JLSJG-D-445NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-445nb) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinergy, formally Jinneng Clean Energy Technology Ltd., is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2013 and backed by Jinneng Holding Group, a state-owned Chinese energy conglomerate. It was named a BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module supplier and became the first Chinese manufacturer to reach mass production of heterojunction (HJT) cell technology, having shipped over 6.5 GW cumulatively by the end of 2020. Q-Cells, operating as Hanwha Q Cells, is a South Korean-owned brand (part of Hanwha Group) with German engineering roots dating back to its 1999 founding in Thalheim, Germany, and it also holds Bloomberg Tier 1 bankability status, with global annual production capacity cited around 11.2 GW. Between the two, Q-Cells carries the stronger institutional footprint, given Hanwha's diversified industrial backing, longer brand history in Western markets, and larger disclosed manufacturing scale.

Jinergy's catalog centers on Poly C-Si, PERC monocrystalline, N-type TOPCon and HJT modules, positioning it as a technology-forward but comparatively lower-profile supplier often used in utility and commercial projects across Asia, and increasingly in Europe, Latin America and Australia. Q-Cells is better known in residential and light-commercial markets, especially in North America and Europe, with a tiered lineup: the Q.PEAK DUO series as a mainstream, cost-conscious PERC/TOPCon option for standard rooftops, and the flagship Q.TRON series using TOPCon-based cells for higher efficiency (up to roughly 22.5%) and stronger 25-year performance guarantees, alongside 1500V-rated modules aimed at commercial and utility-scale ground mounts.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Q-Cells is generally the safer default, particularly for residential and small commercial installs, because of its broader distributor and installer network, longer track record in mature solar markets, and well-documented warranty performance. Jinergy is a credible, technically capable alternative, especially where HJT technology or utility-scale supply relationships are the priority, but it remains less visible to retail buyers and has a thinner base of independent, English-language field reviews compared with Q-Cells.

\---LINKS---

\- https://solarbuildermag.com/news/bloomberg-bumps-jinergy-solar-modules-into-tier-1/ \| Bloomberg New Energy Finance bumps Jinergy modules into Tier 1 \| article

\- https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/jinergy-solar-panels/ \| Jinergy Solar Panels overview - HJT PV Modules \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025 \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/jinergy \| Jinneng Clean Energy Technology Ltd. company profile \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Jinergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Jinergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.