--- title: "Jinergy vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Jinergy vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-akcome" --- # Jinergy vs AKCOME Jinergy has the broader catalog (10 vs 3 models). Jinergy leads on peak efficiency at 23.27%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Jinergy | AKCOME | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | | Suzhou | | Founded | 2014 | 2003 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.jinergy.com](https://www.jinergy.com) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Jinergy | AKCOME | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 10 | 3 | +7 | | Max Power | 510 W | 700 W | +190 W | | Avg Power | 478 W | 672 W | +194 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Jinergy | AKCOME | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.27% | 22.54% | +0.73 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.93% | 21.63% | +0.31 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Jinergy | AKCOME | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.330%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.090 | | Bifacial Share | 5 (50%) | 3 (100%) | +50 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Jinergy skews to higher efficiency: 20% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Jinergy | AKCOME | | --- | --- | --- | | 20-21% | 2 (20.0%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 3 (30.0%) | 2 (66.7%) | | 22-23% | 3 (30.0%) | 1 (33.3%) | | 23%+ | 2 (20.0%) | 0 | ## Power distribution AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup) | Power band | Jinergy | AKCOME | | --- | --- | --- | | 400-499W | 7 (70.0%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 3 (30.0%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 0 | 2 (66.7%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 1 (33.3%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (50%) Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%) | Technology | Jinergy | AKCOME | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (50.0%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 5 (50.0%) | 0 | | HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, Jinergy | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [JKL132-B-510MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-510mh) | 510 | 21.5 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [JKL132-B-505MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-505mh) | 505 | 21.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [JKL132-B-500MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-500mh) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [JKL132-B-495MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-495mh) | 495 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [JKL132-B-490MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-490mh) | 490 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [JLSJG-D-465NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-465nb) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [JLSJG-D-460NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-460nb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [JLSJG-D-455NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-455nb) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [JLSJG-D-450NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-450nb) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [JLSJG-D-445NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-445nb) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, AKCOME | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AKCOME is a Chinese solar manufacturer, formally Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd, founded in 2006 and publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2010. It has appeared on Bloomberg New Energy Finance's Tier 1 list, reflecting recognized bankability, though some trackers noted a temporary delisting in early 2025 tied to website accessibility issues rather than financial distress. Reported module production capacity has varied by source and period, with recent figures around 3.8 GW per year, down from a peak near 9 GW in 2022. Jinergy, formally Jinneng Clean Energy Technology Ltd, is headquartered in Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, China, and was also named a BNEF Tier 1 PV module supplier. Jinergy built one of China's earliest commercial heterojunction (HJT) production lines, launched in 2017, and has historically been sized in the low single-digit GW range, though current annual capacity figures were not confirmed in available sources. Between the two, AKCOME appears to carry the broader institutional footprint, given its longer public-market history and larger historical manufacturing scale. AKCOME's product lineup centers on N-type technology across two main series: the AK iPower line built on HJT cells and the AK iTopper line built on TOPCon cells, both marketed for residential, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount installations. Jinergy has staked its identity specifically on heterojunction technology, being one of the first Chinese manufacturers to commercialize HJT modules, with bifacial HJT panels reporting cell efficiencies above 23-24% in company and certification data; its modules are typically positioned for premium residential and commercial rooftops as well as utility projects where the bifacial gain and strong temperature coefficient of HJT are valued. For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice largely comes down to how much weight is placed on manufacturing scale and continuity of Tier 1 tracking versus specialized HJT engineering pedigree. AKCOME's larger historical footprint and dual TOPCon/HJT lineup make it a reasonably safe generalist choice, while Jinergy is a credible option for buyers specifically prioritizing HJT performance characteristics, though its more modest disclosed scale warrants closer due diligence on current supply stability. Neither brand carries the global name recognition of top-tier giants like JinkoSolar or LONGi, so buyers of either should verify current Tier 1 status and local distributor support before purchase. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/akcome-lands-intersolar-europe-with-n-type-panels/ \| Akcome lands Intersolar Europe with N-type panels \| article \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome solar panels independent review \| review \- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome solar panels: an independent review \| review \- https://solarbuildermag.com/news/bloomberg-bumps-jinergy-solar-modules-into-tier-1/ \| Bloomberg New Energy Finance bumps Jinergy solar modules into Tier 1 \| article \- https://www.pv-tech.org/snec-2017-jinergy-plans-production-of-bifacial-heterojunction-solar-modules/ \| SNEC 2017: Jinergy plans production of bifacial HJT solar modules \| article Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Jinergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome) - [Jinergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome) - [Jinergy vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/jinergy-vs-akcome Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.