---
title: "Jetion vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jetion vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jetion-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# Jetion vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 95 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jetion leans bifacial (92% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jetion | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Jiangyin, Wuxi, Jiangsu | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2004 | 2006 |
| Employees | 1500-3000 | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity | 2.5 GW/year | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [http://www.jetionsolar.com](http://www.jetionsolar.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

Jetion Solar specializes in the research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant accomplishments in terms of production capacity and innovative designs. Jetion Solar joined CNBM (China National Building Materials Group Corporation) in 2014.

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jetion | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 95 | 637 | +542 |
| Max Power | 800 W | 735 W | +65 W |
| Avg Power | 583 W | 523 W | +61 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jetion | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.30% | 24.80% | +0.50 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.61% | 22.18% | +0.43 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jetion | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.274%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.030 |
| Bifacial Share | 87 (92%) | 231 (36%) | +55 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.3 yrs | 28.7 yrs | +0.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jetion skews to higher efficiency: 34% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jetion | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 1 (1.1%) | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 17 (17.9%) | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 45 (47.4%) | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 32 (33.7%) | 184 (28.9%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 23 (3.6%) |


## Power distribution

Jetion offers more 600W+ panels (44% of lineup)


| Power band | Jetion | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 26 (27.4%) | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 27 (28.4%) | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 20 (21.1%) | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 22 (23.2%) | 18 (2.8%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (60%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jetion | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 57 (60.0%) | 258 (40.5%) |
| HJT | 35 (36.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 3 (3.2%) | 158 (24.8%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Jetion


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JT800SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt800sxt-b) | 800 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JT795SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt795sxt-b) | 795 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JT790SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt790sxt-b) | 790 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JT785SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt785sxt-b) | 785 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JT780SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt780sxt-b) | 780 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JT775SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt775sxt-b) | 775 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JT755SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt755slk-b) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JT750SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt750slk-b) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JT745SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt745slk-b) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JT740SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt740slk-b) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jetion Solar and Jinko Solar are both Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global market. Jetion was founded in 2004 and operates under the umbrella of China National Building Materials Group (CNBM), with a module production capacity of 2.5 GW and a workforce of 1,500 to 3,000 employees - placing it firmly in the mid-sized tier of the industry. Despite its smaller scale, Jetion holds Tier 1 bankable status, signaling sufficient financial stability for project financing. Jinko Solar, founded two years later in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, with a staggering production capacity of 130 GW per year and a global workforce exceeding 33,800 employees. Jinko's Tier 1 standing is reinforced by its public listing and a track record of over 300 GW in cumulative global shipments, making it a reference brand for institutional investors and large-scale project developers across every major market.

Jetion's defining strategic choice is an exclusive focus on HJT (heterojunction) cell technology, with 100% of its five-model portfolio built on this platform. HJT delivers a best-in-class temperature coefficient of -0.24%/°C, a 100% bifacial rate, maximum module efficiency of 22.9% and an average of 22.4%, all backed by a 30-year linear performance warranty. These characteristics make Jetion modules well-suited for residential rooftop installations where roof space is constrained and thermal performance matters, as well as premium commercial C&I projects where efficiency per square meter justifies a price premium. Jinko Solar's approach is the inverse - breadth over specialization. Its 545-model portfolio spans entry-level modules to record-breaking 735 Wp TOPCon panels at 24.8% module efficiency. Approximately 39.5% of Jinko's current portfolio uses TOPCon technology, and the company has achieved a world-record TOPCon cell efficiency of 27.02%, confirmed by China's national testing center. Jinko has also earned PVEL Top Performer status for 11 consecutive years, a benchmark that resonates strongly with utility-scale developers and EPCs globally.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges on project type and risk profile. Jetion is the stronger technical choice for space-constrained residential or C&I applications where HJT's low thermal losses, full bifaciality, and long warranty are valued - though its narrow product range and smaller manufacturing footprint introduce supply continuity considerations for large-volume procurement. Jinko Solar offers unmatched scale, a proven global supply chain, and a diverse portfolio covering virtually every project category, making it the lower-risk default for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large C&I portfolios, and any application where long-term supplier viability and broad module selection are paramount.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jetion vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jetion-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Jetion vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jetion-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Jetion vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jetion-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jetion-vs-jinko-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.