---
title: "Jetion vs DAS Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jetion vs DAS Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jetion-vs-das-solar"
---

# Jetion vs DAS Solar

DAS Solar has the broader catalog (97 vs 95 models). Jetion leads on peak efficiency at 24.30%. Jetion leans bifacial (92% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jetion | DAS Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Jiangyin, Wuxi, Jiangsu | Quzhou, Zhejiang |
| Founded | 2004 | 2018 |
| Employees | 1500-3000 | 500+ |
| Annual capacity | 2.5 GW/year | 40-50 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.jetionsolar.com](http://www.jetionsolar.com) | [https://www.das-solar.com](https://www.das-solar.com) |

Jetion Solar specializes in the research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant accomplishments in terms of production capacity and innovative designs. Jetion Solar joined CNBM (China National Building Materials Group Corporation) in 2014.

DAS Solar, founded in 2018, specializes in the development, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency solar cells and photovoltaic modules. The company is committed to providing integrated PV new energy system solutions. DAS Solar is recognized as a global high-tech enterprise and a leader in N-type photovoltaic...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jetion | DAS Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 95 | 97 | +2 |
| Max Power | 800 W | 715 W | +85 W |
| Avg Power | 583 W | 528 W | +56 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jetion | DAS Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.30% | 24.10% | +0.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.61% | 21.95% | +0.65 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jetion | DAS Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.274%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.030 |
| Bifacial Share | 87 (92%) | 73 (75%) | +16 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.3 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jetion skews to higher efficiency: 34% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jetion | DAS Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 1 (1.1%) | 8 (8.2%) |
| 21-22% | 17 (17.9%) | 26 (26.8%) |
| 22-23% | 45 (47.4%) | 42 (43.3%) |
| 23%+ | 32 (33.7%) | 14 (14.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.2%) |


## Power distribution

Jetion offers more 600W+ panels (44% of lineup)


| Power band | Jetion | DAS Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 26 (27.4%) | 46 (47.4%) |
| 500-599W | 27 (28.4%) | 28 (28.9%) |
| 600-699W | 20 (21.1%) | 19 (19.6%) |
| 700W+ | 22 (23.2%) | 4 (4.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (60%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (76%)


| Technology | Jetion | DAS Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 57 (60.0%) | 74 (76.3%) |
| HJT | 35 (36.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 3 (3.2%) | 23 (23.7%) |


## Top panels, Jetion


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JT800SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt800sxt-b) | 800 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JT795SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt795sxt-b) | 795 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JT790SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt790sxt-b) | 790 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JT785SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt785sxt-b) | 785 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JT780SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt780sxt-b) | 780 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JT775SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt775sxt-b) | 775 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JT755SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt755slk-b) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JT750SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt750slk-b) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JT745SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt745slk-b) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JT740SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt740slk-b) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, DAS Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DAS-DH132NC-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH156NA-650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh156na-650w) | 650 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DAS-DH132NE-650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132ne-650w) | 650 | 24.1 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH156NA-645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh156na-645w) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DAS-DH132NE-645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132ne-645w) | 645 | 23.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH156NA-640W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh156na-640w) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [Jetion vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jetion-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs DAS Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-das-solar)
- [Jetion vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jetion-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs DAS Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-das-solar)
- [Jetion vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jetion-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs DAS Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-das-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jetion-vs-das-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

