---
title: "JA Solar vs Zonergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs Zonergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-zonergy"
---

# JA Solar vs Zonergy

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 5 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Zigong, Sichuan |
| Founded | 2005 | 2007 |
| Employees | 37,289 | 201-300 |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year | null GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 |  |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [http://www.zonergy.com](http://www.zonergy.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Zonergy is a world-renowned enterprise specializing in smart microgrid integrated solutions. The company is committed to providing first-class smart micro-grid solutions for global customers, covering technology research and development, product production, sales and trade, engineering design and implementation, and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 5 | +499 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 460 W | +280 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 450 W | +6 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 21.16% | +3.64 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 20.70% | +0.43 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.350%/°C | +0.028 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 0 (0%) | +47 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +2.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 4 (80.0%) |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 1 (20.0%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | JA Solar | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 0 |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Zonergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZPM 460MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-460mh3-72) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZPM 455MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-455mh3-72) | 455 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZPM 450MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-450mh3-72) | 450 | 20.7 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZPM 445MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-445mh3-72) | 445 | 20.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZPM 440MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-440mh3-72) | 440 | 20.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar and Zonergy are both Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturers, but they occupy fundamentally different positions in the global solar market. JA Solar was founded in 2005, employs over 37,000 people, and has built a manufacturing capacity exceeding 100 GW - a scale that placed it joint first in Wood Mackenzie's Global Solar Module Manufacturer Ranking for H1 2025. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status according to Bloomberg NEF and is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, with a portfolio of 524 panel models serving markets across Europe, Asia, and the Americas. Zonergy, founded in 2007, is a considerably smaller operation with only 201 to 300 employees and no publicly disclosed production capacity. It does not carry Tier 1 bankable status, and its current product catalog consists of just 5 panel models. While Zonergy has demonstrated project execution capability - notably a 300 MW IPP installation in Pakistan - its global commercial footprint remains limited and largely project-specific.

Technology-wise, JA Solar offers a broad and diverse portfolio with panels reaching a maximum output of 740 Wp and a peak efficiency of 24.4%. Nearly 44% of its lineup consists of bifacial modules, making it well suited to utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects where rear-side gain is a key yield driver. PERC technology accounts for roughly 52% of the portfolio, with the remainder including TOPCon and higher-tier cell types. The average temperature coefficient of Pmax sits at -0.32%/°C, and the average warranty term across the portfolio exceeds 27 years - both strong indicators for long-term asset performance. JA Solar is a strong fit for residential rooftop installations, large-scale commercial projects, and utility-scale deployments where bankability and long-term warranties are prerequisites for project financing. Zonergy's portfolio is entirely PERC-based, with a maximum output of 460 Wp and a peak efficiency of 21.16%. No bifacial modules are offered, the average warranty stands at 25 years, and the average temperature coefficient of Pmax is -0.35%/°C - slightly less favorable than JA Solar's across each dimension.

For international buyers comparing the two, JA Solar is the clear choice in any scenario where bankability, project financing, insurance coverage, or long-term supply security is a factor. Its top-ranked industry position, extensive product range, and verified manufacturing scale make it suitable for virtually any project type or size. Zonergy may remain competitive on price in smaller or budget-driven installations in emerging markets, but the limited portfolio depth, absence of Tier 1 status, and lack of transparent capacity data represent material risks for buyers who need reliable, long-term module supply guarantees.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-zonergy)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-zonergy)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-zonergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-zonergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.