---
title: "JA Solar vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-znshine"
---

# JA Solar vs ZNShine

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 212 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Suqian |
| Founded | 2005 | 1988 |
| Employees | 37,289 | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 212 | +292 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 670 W | +70 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 535 W | +78 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.83% | +1.97 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 21.35% | +0.21 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.007 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 89 (42%) | +5 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

ZNShine offers more 600W+ panels (20% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 43 (20.3%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%)


| Technology | JA Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 134 (63.2%) |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 78 (36.8%) |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in China, ranks among the world's top three solar module manufacturers by shipment volume, with over 37,000 employees and a production capacity exceeding 100 GW. Listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), the company shipped approximately 79 GW of modules in 2024 and carries an AA bankability rating from independent analysts - reflecting its financial scale and supply-chain resilience. ZNShine has a considerably longer history, having been founded in 1988 originally as a glass manufacturer before pivoting into solar modules. With around 1,200 employees and a 10 GW production capacity, it trades on China's NEEQ (New Third Board) and holds Tier 1 bankable status, though independent bankability assessments place it in the B-rated tier - a meaningful distinction for project finance contexts.

Both manufacturers lead their portfolios with PERC cell technology - accounting for roughly 52% of JA Solar's 524-model lineup and approximately 63% of ZNShine's 212-model range. JA Solar's broader portfolio spans a wide power band, with a maximum of 740 Wp and an average of about 442 Wp per panel, making it well suited to residential rooftop installations, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount deployments alike. ZNShine's portfolio is narrower but skewed toward higher-wattage modules - averaging 534 Wp with a maximum of 670 Wp - signaling a stronger orientation toward commercial and industrial rooftop or ground-mount applications. ZNShine's average panel efficiency (21.35%) modestly exceeds JA Solar's (20.87%), and it offers a slightly longer average warranty period (28.28 vs. 27.85 years). ZNShine also differentiates through graphene-coated self-cleaning glass and double-glass module construction, which can reduce maintenance overhead on large or hard-to-access installations.

For international buyers requiring bankable, globally supported modules across a full project spectrum, JA Solar's scale, extensive distribution network, and high bankability rating make it the lower-risk choice - particularly where project financing or insurance terms demand top-tier supplier credentials. ZNShine presents a credible alternative for buyers focused on higher-wattage C&I or ground-mount deployments who are comfortable working with a smaller, more specialized supplier and whose financing arrangements do not impose strict bankability thresholds.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.