---
title: "JA Solar vs Vikram Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs Vikram Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-vikram-solar"
---

# JA Solar vs Vikram Solar

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 202 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Vikram Solar leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | India |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Kolkata |
| Founded | 2005 | 2005 |
| Employees | 37,289 | 1,895 |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year | 9.5 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 | NSE, BSE: VIKRAMSOLR |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [http://www.vikramsolar.com](http://www.vikramsolar.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Vikram Solar Limited is a leading Indian solar photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturer and solar solutions provider. They offer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for solar plants. The company manufactures high-efficiency solar PV modules and has a pan-India...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 202 | +302 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 735 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 553 W | +97 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.69% | +1.11 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 21.45% | +0.31 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.334%/°C | +0.012 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 150 (74%) | +27 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 28.6 yrs | +0.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 11 (5.4%) |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 42 (20.8%) |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 106 (52.5%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 27 (13.4%) |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 16 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Vikram Solar offers more 600W+ panels (42% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 12 (5.9%) |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 54 (26.7%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 52 (25.7%) |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 69 (34.2%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 15 (7.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)


| Technology | JA Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 152 (75.2%) |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 8 (4.0%) |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 30 (14.9%) |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 12 (5.9%) |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Vikram Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-730-05) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-725-05) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar and Vikram Solar were both founded in 2005, but they operate at vastly different scales and come from contrasting market backgrounds. JA Solar, headquartered in China and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), employs over 37,000 people and has a production capacity exceeding 100 GW, placing it among the largest module manufacturers in the world - Wood Mackenzie ranked it jointly at the top of the global module manufacturer ranking for the first half of 2025. Vikram Solar, an Indian company listed on both the NSE and BSE, employs approximately 1,895 people and reached a total manufacturing capacity of 9.5 GW following the commissioning of its 5 GW automated Vallam facility in Tamil Nadu in November 2025. Both companies hold Tier 1 bankable status and appear on the BloombergNEF tier-one module manufacturer list. Technologically, both lead their portfolios with PERC cell technology, though Vikram Solar has transitioned its entire module lineup to the G12R large-format wafer and carries a significantly higher share of bifacial modules - 81.1% versus 44.3% for JA Solar. Vikram Solar's average module efficiency stands at 21.45% compared to JA Solar's 20.87%, while JA Solar holds the edge in peak performance metrics, reaching up to 24.4% efficiency and 740 Wp maximum power output.

JA Solar's portfolio of 524 distinct panel models, its established European distribution network, and ongoing R&D investments - including a 26.7% efficiency inverted perovskite cell and TOPCon modules such as the DeepBlue 4.0 Pro and 5.0 series - make it well suited for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount deployments alike. Its breadth of offering and competitive pricing give it wide applicability across project types globally. Vikram Solar's strength lies in its highly bifacial-skewed portfolio and a higher average module power output of 551.7 Wp (versus JA Solar's 441.7 Wp), reflecting a product mix oriented toward commercial and utility-scale applications. Its consistent recognition as a PVEL top performer and recent manufacturing modernization with intelligent robotics and built-in quality systems underline its reliability credentials, particularly for buyers in markets where Indian-origin supply chains attract preferential tariff treatment.

For international buyers choosing between the two, JA Solar offers unmatched scale, product variety, and a proven global supply chain - an advantage for any project requiring volume and flexibility. Vikram Solar presents a compelling option for utility-scale buyers who prioritize bifacial yield, longer average product warranties (29 years versus 27.85 years for JA Solar), and supply diversification away from Chinese manufacturing, particularly in markets such as the United States or Europe where origin-of-manufacture matters for financing or policy compliance.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-vikram-solar)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-vikram-solar)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-vikram-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-vikram-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.