---
title: "JA Solar vs Shinson Technology - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs Shinson Technology solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-shinson-technology"
---

# JA Solar vs Shinson Technology

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 105 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Shinson Technology leans bifacial (62% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2005 | 2010 |
| Employees | 37,289 | 500+ |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year | 10+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 |  |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [http://shinsontech.com](http://shinsontech.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Shinson Technology is a leading professional supplier in the renewable energy industry, specializing in the production and distribution of high-quality PV modules, completed PV kits, and energy storage solutions. With a commitment to sustainable energy solutions, they strive to provide innovative and reliable products...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | Shinson Technology | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 105 | +399 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 720 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 477 W | +21 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | Shinson Technology | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.23% | +1.57 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 20.54% | +0.60 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | Shinson Technology | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.314%/°C | +0.008 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 65 (62%) | +15 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 27.7 yrs | +0.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 24 (22.9%) |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 17 (16.2%) |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 31 (29.5%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 28 (26.7%) |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 5 (4.8%) |


## Power distribution

Shinson Technology offers more 600W+ panels (18% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 25 (23.8%) |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 45 (42.9%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 16 (15.2%) |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 13 (12.4%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 6 (5.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (40%)


| Technology | JA Solar | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 35 (33.3%) |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 42 (40.0%) |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 4 (3.8%) |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 15 (14.3%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 5 (4.8%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 4 (3.8%) |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Shinson Technology


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [S720M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s720m66ht4bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [S715M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s715m66ht4bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [S710M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s710m66ht4bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [S705M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s705m66ht4bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [S700M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66nt4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [S700M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [S695M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s695m66nt4bf) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [S690M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s690m66nt4bf) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [S685M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s685m66nt4bf) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [S680M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s680m66nt4bf) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar, founded in 2005 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, employing over 37,000 people and operating production capacity exceeding 100 GW per year. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status confirmed by S&P Global Commodity Insights and ranked third globally in module shipments in 2024, shipping approximately 79 GW - a 40% year-on-year increase. Shinson Technology, established in 2010, is a considerably smaller Chinese manufacturer with a workforce of over 500 employees and annual production capacity exceeding 10 GW, positioned as a technology-focused niche player rather than a volume leader. Shinson does not carry a publicly confirmed Tier 1 bankability rating, which is a meaningful distinction for project finance contexts.

JA Solar's portfolio of 524 panel models covers a wide power range up to 740 Wp, with an average efficiency of 20.87% and a maximum efficiency of 24.4%. PERC remains the dominant cell technology at 52.1% of the portfolio, complemented by TOPCon and other N-type offerings. Its scale, Tier 1 status, and PVEL Top Performer recognition make it a natural fit for utility-scale ground-mount projects and bank-financed commercial C&I installations, while its broad catalog also serves residential rooftop markets worldwide. Shinson Technology's 105-model portfolio reaches up to 720 Wp with a notably higher share of bifacial panels - 61.9% versus 44.3% for JA Solar - and a slightly better average temperature coefficient of -0.314%/°C compared to JA Solar's -0.323%/°C. TOPCon leads Shinson's technology mix at 40% of the portfolio, and the company additionally offers HJT modules, flexible panels, and BIPV solutions, making it relevant for specialized or architectural applications.

For international buyers prioritizing financial security, supply chain reliability, and long-term bankability, JA Solar is the clear choice - backed by verified Tier 1 status, global manufacturing scale, and an average warranty period of 27.85 years. Shinson Technology may appeal to developers seeking a higher bifacial ratio in their module selection or those pursuing niche applications such as building-integrated PV or flexible modules, where technological differentiation takes precedence over brand scale and institutional recognition.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Shinson Technology](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-shinson-technology)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Shinson Technology](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-shinson-technology)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Shinson Technology](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-shinson-technology)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-shinson-technology

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.