---
title: "JA Solar vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-runergy"
---

# JA Solar vs Runergy

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 124 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 2005 | 2013 |
| Employees | 37,289 | 15,000 |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 |  |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 124 | +380 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 740 W |  |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 579 W | +123 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.10% | +0.70 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 22.42% | +1.28 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.023 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 95 (77%) | +29 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 9 (7.3%) |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 26 (21.0%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 48 (38.7%) |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 41 (33.1%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 36 (29.0%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 28 (22.6%) |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 35 (28.2%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 25 (20.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%)


| Technology | JA Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 32 (25.8%) |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 0 |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 74 (59.7%) |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 18 (14.5%) |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar and Runergy are both China-based, Tier 1 bankable solar module manufacturers, though they differ substantially in scale, market reach, and corporate history. JA Solar was founded in 2005 and is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, employing over 37,000 people and operating a module production capacity exceeding 100 GW. The company consistently ranks among the world's largest module producers - Wood Mackenzie placed JA Solar jointly first in its global module manufacturer ranking for the first half of 2025, and the firm earned Top Performer status in PVEL reliability testing for the tenth consecutive time. Runergy was founded in 2013 and employs approximately 15,000 people. Its module production capacity stands at 23 GW, but it operates 63 GW of solar cell manufacturing capacity across facilities in China and Thailand, positioning it primarily as a major upstream cell supplier to other global brands - including JA Solar, Canadian Solar, and GCL - while also selling finished modules under its Hyperion brand. Both manufacturers hold Tier 1 bankability status, making financing accessible for projects using either brand.

JA Solar's portfolio of 524 panel models is built predominantly on PERC cell technology (approximately 52% of the lineup), with growing TOPCon and N-type additions, yielding an average module efficiency of 20.9% and an average rated power of 442 Wp. Its breadth of range and strong logistics network make it well-suited for residential rooftop installations, mid-scale commercial C&I projects, and utility-scale ground-mount deployments alike - wherever supply flexibility and brand familiarity matter. Runergy's more focused 98-model portfolio is heavily oriented toward N-type cell technology (over 58% of panels), delivering a significantly higher average efficiency of 22.2% and average power of 574 Wp. Its bifacial penetration reaches 78.6% compared to 44.3% for JA Solar, and its average temperature coefficient of -0.303%/°C outperforms JA Solar's -0.323%/°C, meaning better real-world output under elevated operating temperatures. These characteristics make Runergy particularly compelling for high-density commercial rooftops and utility-scale ground-mount projects where yield per unit area is the primary driver. The company also claims a world-record 26.55% full-area N-type cell efficiency, certified by Germany's ISFH, underscoring its standing as a technology leader in cell manufacturing.

For buyers prioritizing supply reliability, brand recognition, a wide product selection across all segments, and a proven two-decade track record, JA Solar represents a low-risk default choice supported by top-tier global rankings. Runergy offers a technically superior average panel specification - especially attractive for projects demanding maximum power density, strong bifacial yield gains, and cutting-edge N-type performance - but its smaller module portfolio and more limited brand exposure relative to JA Solar may warrant additional supply-chain due diligence for large-volume procurement. Both manufacturers provide competitive warranty terms, with Runergy's average of approximately 28.9 years slightly exceeding JA Solar's 27.9 years, reflecting confidence in long-term product durability from both sides.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-runergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.