---
title: "JA Solar vs RMCIP - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs RMCIP solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-rmcip"
---

# JA Solar vs RMCIP

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 1 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | RMCIP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Russia |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Ryazan |
| Founded | 2005 | 1963 |
| Employees | 37,289 |  |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year | \<0.1 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 |  |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [http://rmcip.com](http://rmcip.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC (RMCIP) is a Russian industrial manufacturer established in 1963, primarily known as the only producer of sealed magnetically operated contacts (reed switches) in Russia and CIS countries. The company also manufactures crystalline silicon photovoltaic solar modules (RZMP...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | RMCIP | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 1 | +503 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 200 W | +540 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 200 W | +256 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | RMCIP | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 12.40% | +12.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 12.40% | +8.73 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | RMCIP | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.400%/°C | +0.078 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 0 (0%) | +47 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +2.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | RMCIP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | RMCIP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | JA Solar | RMCIP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 0 |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, RMCIP


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RZMP-200-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/rmcip-rzmp-200-t) | 200 | 12.4 | -0.400 | Polycrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar and RMCIP represent two manufacturers operating at opposite ends of the solar industry spectrum. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Shenzhen, China, is one of the world's largest photovoltaic module producers. According to Wood Mackenzie's Global Solar Module Manufacturer Ranking for the first half of 2025, JA Solar jointly claimed the top position worldwide alongside Trinasolar. The company has a manufacturing capacity exceeding 100 GW, employs over 37,000 people, is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, and holds Tier 1 status awarded by S&P Global Commodity Insights - confirming its full bankability and eligibility for project finance from institutional lenders. By mid-2025, cumulative global shipments had reached nearly 300 GW across 178 countries. RMCIP (Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC), founded in 1963 in Ryazan, Russia, is primarily known as a manufacturer of reed switches and sealed magnetic contacts for industrial and defense applications. Solar panels constitute a peripheral segment of its business, with production capacity below 0.1 GW. It holds no Tier 1 status, carries no recognized bankability rating, and lists only a single panel model at 200 Wp in the available data.

JA Solar's product portfolio spans 524 panel models, anchored by its Deep Blue series utilizing PERC technology - which accounts for approximately 52% of its lineup - alongside a growing range of higher-efficiency TOPCon modules. The maximum panel power reaches 740 Wp, peak efficiency is 24.4%, and roughly 44% of its portfolio consists of bifacial modules well-suited to ground-mount utility-scale and commercial C&I applications where rear-side irradiance gains are achievable. An average temperature coefficient of -0.32%/°C per degree Celsius is competitive for hot summer conditions, and average warranty coverage extends to nearly 28 years. JA Solar is a strong fit for residential rooftop installs, commercial rooftop systems, and large-scale ground-mounted solar farms alike. RMCIP's sole documented panel at 200 Wp uses an unspecified cell technology, has no bifacial capability, carries a 25-year warranty, and a temperature coefficient of -0.40%/°C - a notably weaker thermal performance figure. Its practical application is limited to niche off-grid or special-purpose installations in the Russian and CIS markets.

For international buyers, project developers, or installers evaluating these two manufacturers, JA Solar is the clear and straightforward choice for any grid-connected application, from residential rooftops to utility-scale farms. It offers documented reliability, broad module availability, institutional bankability, and a technically competitive product range. RMCIP has no meaningful presence outside Russia and its single-panel offering does not meet the technical or commercial expectations of modern European or global solar markets.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-rmcip)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-rmcip)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-rmcip)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-rmcip

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.