---
title: "JA Solar vs Renesola - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs Renesola solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-renesola"
---

# JA Solar vs Renesola

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 115 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Renesola leans bifacial (61% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | Renesola |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2005 | 2005 |
| Employees | 37,289 | 100-500 |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year | 16.5+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 | NYSE: SOL |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [http://www.renesola-energy.com](http://www.renesola-energy.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Renesola, established in 2005, is a pioneer in the global new energy field, committed to mitigating global warming and providing quality power station solutions for global clients. They offer one-stop solutions including development, financing, design, construction, operation, and maintenance, along with...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | Renesola | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 115 | +389 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 720 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 514 W | +58 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | Renesola | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.51% | +1.29 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 21.67% | +0.54 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | Renesola | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.018 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 70 (61%) | +14 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 29.7 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | Renesola |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 15 (13.0%) |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 3 (2.6%) |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 20 (17.4%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 65 (56.5%) |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 12 (10.4%) |


## Power distribution

Renesola offers more 600W+ panels (30% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | Renesola |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 16 (13.9%) |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 33 (28.7%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 31 (27.0%) |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 28 (24.3%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 7 (6.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (77%)


| Technology | JA Solar | Renesola |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 26 (22.6%) |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 88 (76.5%) |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 1 (0.9%) |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Renesola


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RS9-720NBG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-720nbg-e1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RS9-715NBG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-715nbg-e1) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RS9-710NBG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-710nbg-e1) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RS9-705NG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-705ng-e1) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RS9-705NBG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-705nbg-e1) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RS9-700NG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-700ng-e1) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RS9-700NBG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-700nbg-e1) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RS9-695NG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-695ng-e1) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RS9-690NG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-690ng-e1) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RS9-685NG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-685ng-e1) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar and Renesola are both Chinese solar module manufacturers founded in 2005, but they differ dramatically in scale and market positioning. JA Solar has grown into a global heavyweight with over 37,000 employees and a production capacity exceeding 100 GW, ranking jointly at the top of Wood Mackenzie's Global Solar Module Manufacturer Ranking for H1 2025 and holding roughly 11% of global module shipments. Renesola, by contrast, operates at a much smaller scale with 100 to 500 employees and a stated capacity of 16.5+ GW, positioning itself as a specialist mid-tier manufacturer. Both companies hold BNEF Tier 1 bankable status, making them eligible for project financing, though JA Solar is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange while Renesola has traded on the NYSE since 2008, giving it higher visibility among Western investors. Both are headquartered in China and compete in the global export market, including Europe.

On the technology side, Renesola has made a more decisive shift toward modern N-type cell architecture, with 76.5% of its portfolio consisting of N-type modules compared to JA Solar's portfolio, where PERC technology still accounts for 52.1% of panels. This translates into measurable performance advantages for Renesola: a higher average efficiency (21.67% vs. 20.87%), a better temperature coefficient of power (-0.304%/°C vs. -0.323%/°C), a higher bifacial share (60.9% vs. 44.3%), and a longer average product warranty (29.65 years vs. 27.85 years). JA Solar's broader catalogue of 524 panel models - reaching up to 740 Wp - covers every segment from small residential rooftops to utility-scale ground-mount projects, while Renesola's 115-model portfolio, with a higher average output of 513.8 Wp, is focused on higher-power modern installations in commercial C&I and utility segments.

For international buyers, JA Solar is the lower-risk choice for large utility-scale or commercial projects where supply chain depth, logistics reliability, and global service networks are critical - its scale and top-tier rankings provide strong bankability assurance. Renesola offers a compelling alternative for buyers prioritizing leading-edge N-type technology, superior temperature performance, and longer warranties in residential or commercial rooftop applications where roof space is limited and long-term yield matters most. The decision ultimately hinges on project size, technology preference, and local distributor support.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Renesola](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-renesola)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Renesola](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-renesola)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Renesola](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-renesola)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-renesola

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.