---
title: "JA Solar vs LG - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs LG solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-lg"
---

# JA Solar vs LG

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 24 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | LG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Seoul |
| Founded | 2005 | 1958 |
| Employees | 37,289 | 74,000+ |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 | KRX: 066570 |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [https://www.lg.com](https://www.lg.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

LG Electronics is a South Korean multinational electronics company. Founded in 1958, LG is a global leader and technology innovator in consumer electronics, mobile communications, and home appliances. Although LG officially closed its solar panel business in 2022, the company continues to offer support for existing...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | LG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 24 | +480 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 455 W | +285 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 404 W | +52 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | LG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.10% | +2.70 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 20.74% | +0.40 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | LG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.315%/°C | +0.007 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 4 (17%) | +31 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +2.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | LG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 4 (16.7%) |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 10 (41.7%) |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 9 (37.5%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 1 (4.2%) |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | LG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 13 (54.2%) |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 11 (45.8%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (100%)


| Technology | JA Solar | LG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 0 |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 24 (100.0%) |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, LG


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LG455N2W-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg455n2w-e6) | 455 | 20.7 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LG450N2W-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg450n2w-e6) | 450 | 20.5 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LG445N2W-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg445n2w-e6) | 445 | 20.2 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LG440N2T-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg440n2t-e6) | 440 | 19.8 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LG440N2W-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg440n2w-e6) | 440 | 20.0 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LG440QAC-A6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg440qac-a6) | 440 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LG435QAC-A6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg435qac-a6) | 435 | 21.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LG435N2T-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg435n2t-e6) | 435 | 19.6 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LG430N2T-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg430n2t-e6) | 430 | 19.4 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LG430QAC-A6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg430qac-a6) | 430 | 21.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar and LG represent fundamentally different market positions in the solar PV sector. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Beijing, China, is one of the world's leading active solar manufacturers, holding Tier 1 bankable status and boasting production capacity exceeding 100 GW annually. Listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE) with over 37,000 employees, JA Solar operates across more than 135 countries and consistently ranks among the top global module suppliers. LG Electronics, a South Korean conglomerate founded in 1958 and listed on the Korea Exchange (KRX), exited solar panel manufacturing in 2022. While LG's broader organization employs over 74,000 people across multiple industries, its solar division no longer produces new modules - leaving only residual secondary-market inventory and a commitment to honor existing warranties.

JA Solar's active portfolio of 524 panels spans a wide power range, reaching up to 740 Wp with a maximum panel efficiency of 24.4% and an average of 20.9%. The portfolio is predominantly PERC-based (52.1% of panels) with a growing share of bifacial modules - 44.3% of the lineup - making it well suited for residential rooftop installs, large utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications. The average product warranty of nearly 28 years further reinforces long-term project bankability. LG's legacy portfolio of 24 panels was built entirely on N-type cell technology, a premium choice that delivered a maximum efficiency of 22.1% and a slightly superior average temperature coefficient of -0.315%/°C compared to JA Solar's -0.323%/°C. LG panels were historically favored for premium residential installations where roof space was constrained and module quality was the primary selection criterion.

For buyers choosing between these two manufacturers today, the practical decision is straightforward. JA Solar is a fully active, Tier 1 certified producer with a broad and evolving portfolio, ongoing R&D investment, and reliable warranty support - making it the clear choice for any new installation, whether residential, commercial, or utility-scale. LG panels, while technically distinguished, are no longer in production and sourcing them introduces supply continuity and long-term support risks that most project developers and homeowners would be right to avoid.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs LG](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-lg)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs LG](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-lg)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs LG](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-lg)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-lg

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.