---
title: "JA Solar vs LEDVANCE - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs LEDVANCE solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-ledvance"
---

# JA Solar vs LEDVANCE

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 124 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. LEDVANCE leans bifacial (62% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | LEDVANCE |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Germany |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Garching bei München |
| Founded | 2005 | 2016 |
| Employees | 37,289 |  |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 |  |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [https://www.ledvance.com](https://www.ledvance.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | LEDVANCE | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 124 | +380 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 705 W | +35 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 518 W | +62 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | LEDVANCE | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.40% | +1.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 21.58% | +0.44 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | LEDVANCE | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.313%/°C | +0.009 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 77 (62%) | +15 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | LEDVANCE |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 4 (3.2%) |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 30 (24.2%) |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 42 (33.9%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 43 (34.7%) |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 5 (4.0%) |


## Power distribution

LEDVANCE offers more 600W+ panels (21% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | LEDVANCE |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 8 (6.5%) |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 56 (45.2%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 34 (27.4%) |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 22 (17.7%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 4 (3.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%)


| Technology | JA Solar | LEDVANCE |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 60 (48.4%) |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 54 (43.5%) |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 10 (8.1%) |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, LEDVANCE


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685-705n66ub-sf-f7-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [M705N66UB-SF-F7](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m705n66ub-sf-f7) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685-705n66ub-sf-f7-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [M700N66UB-SF-F7](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m700n66ub-sf-f7) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685-705n66ub-sf-f7-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [M695N66UB-SF-F7](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m695n66ub-sf-f7) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-690](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685-705n66ub-sf-f7-690) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [M690N66UB-SF-F7](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m690n66ub-sf-f7) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-685](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685-705n66ub-sf-f7-685) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [M685N66UB-SF-F7](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685n66ub-sf-f7) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar and LEDVANCE represent two fundamentally different tiers of the solar PV manufacturing landscape. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers, with a workforce of over 37,000 employees and a production capacity exceeding 100 GW per year. It holds Tier 1 bankable status, ranked second globally in panel shipments, and achieved Top Performer recognition in PVEL's 2025 reliability scorecard - all indicators of a deeply established industrial player. LEDVANCE, by contrast, was founded in 2016 in Germany, originally as a lighting company, and entered the solar PV segment more recently under its LEDVANCE Renewables division. It does not carry Tier 1 bankable status and maintains a portfolio of 124 panel models compared to JA Solar's 524. Both manufacturers lead their portfolios with PERC cell technology, but JA Solar has extended its lineup into high-power TOPCon modules, reaching a maximum output of 740 Wp and a peak efficiency of 24.4%, versus LEDVANCE's ceiling of 705 Wp and 23.4%. LEDVANCE's average panel efficiency across its portfolio (21.6%) is marginally higher than JA Solar's (20.9%), and its bifacial share is notably larger at 62.1% versus 44.3%.

JA Solar's breadth of product - spanning residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications - combined with its global distribution network makes it a natural fit for large ground-mount utility projects and commercial C&I installations where bankability is a financing prerequisite. Its Deep Blue 4.0 TOPCon series competes at the high end of the efficiency spectrum, and its temperature coefficient averages -0.32%/°C, a standard PERC-range figure. LEDVANCE positions itself as a European-branded one-stop-shop offering panels, inverters, and battery storage in an integrated package. Its higher average panel wattage (518 Wp versus 442 Wp for JA Solar) and slightly better average temperature coefficient (-0.31%/°C) offer a modest technical edge for space-constrained residential rooftop installs or mid-scale C&I projects where a European brand identity and bundled system support carry commercial value.

For international buyers comparing the two, JA Solar is the lower-risk choice for any project requiring project finance, insurance, or long-term performance guarantees - its Tier 1 status, scale, and track record are unmatched by LEDVANCE's still-emerging solar division. LEDVANCE may appeal to European installers targeting residential or small commercial customers who value a recognizable European brand and simplified procurement through an integrated system offer, but the absence of Tier 1 recognition is a meaningful limitation for larger or bank-financed projects.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs LEDVANCE](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ledvance)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs LEDVANCE](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ledvance)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs LEDVANCE](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-ledvance)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-ledvance

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.