---
title: "JA Solar vs Leapton - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs Leapton solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-leapton"
---

# JA Solar vs Leapton

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 119 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | Leapton |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Japan |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Kobe |
| Founded | 2005 | 2012 |
| Employees | 37,289 |  |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year | 3+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 |  |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [http://www.leaptonpv.com/](http://www.leaptonpv.com/) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Leapton Energy, headquartered in Japan, is a global leader in the solar PV industry, specializing in Tier-1 solar modules, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and inverters. With over 10 years of experience, Leapton Energy's products are now available in more than 70 countries worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | Leapton | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 119 | +385 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 720 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 546 W | +90 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | Leapton | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.32% | +1.48 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 22.18% | +1.04 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | Leapton | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.307%/°C | +0.015 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 58 (49%) | +2 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +1.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | Leapton |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 5 (4.2%) |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 32 (26.9%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 74 (62.2%) |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 8 (6.7%) |


## Power distribution

Leapton offers more 600W+ panels (32% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | Leapton |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 48 (40.3%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 33 (27.7%) |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 28 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 10 (8.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)


| Technology | JA Solar | Leapton |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 105 (88.2%) |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 14 (11.8%) |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Leapton


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar and Leapton occupy fundamentally different positions in the global solar PV market, even though both carry Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankable status. JA Solar was founded in 2005 in China, is publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, and employs over 37,000 people worldwide. With production capacity exceeding 100 GW, it consistently ranks among the top two module manufacturers globally by shipment volume, supplying projects across more than 130 countries. Leapton, founded in 2012 and headquartered in Japan, operates at a far smaller scale with a declared production capacity of over 3 GW. Despite its more modest footprint, Leapton has built solid credibility - achieving Tier 1 status and distributing panels to over 70 countries. In short, JA Solar is a global volume leader with deep supply chain leverage, while Leapton is a more specialized, technology-forward manufacturer targeting premium efficiency segments.

JA Solar's broad portfolio of 524 modules is still led by PERC cell technology, which accounts for 52.1% of its lineup. Average module power sits at 441.7 Wp with average efficiency of 20.87%, while top-tier models reach a maximum output of 740 Wp and peak efficiency of 24.4%. This breadth makes JA Solar well-suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where supply continuity, financing familiarity, and competitive pricing are the primary drivers. Leapton's smaller catalog of 119 modules tells a different technological story: 88.2% of its portfolio uses N-type TOPCon cells, lifting average efficiency to 22.18% and average power to 546.3 Wp, with a maximum of 720 Wp. Its temperature coefficient of -0.307% per degree Celsius is slightly more favorable than JA Solar's -0.323%, and its average warranty term of 29.45 years edges ahead of JA Solar's 27.85 years. These characteristics make Leapton a strong fit for space-constrained residential rooftop installs and premium commercial applications where power density and long-term yield matter most.

For international buyers, JA Solar represents the lower-risk, more liquid option - backed by two decades of manufacturing history, repeated PVEL Top Performer recognition, and a virtually unmatched global distribution and financing ecosystem. Leapton is the right choice for buyers who prioritize a modern, TOPCon-heavy portfolio, are comfortable with a smaller Tier 1 brand, and want strong warranty terms. Where yield per square meter is the decisive factor - constrained rooftops, premium residential, or space-limited C&I - Leapton's technology profile gives it a clear edge. At scale and across all segments, JA Solar remains the benchmark.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Leapton](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-leapton)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Leapton](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-leapton)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Leapton](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-leapton)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-leapton

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.