---
title: "JA Solar vs Kensol - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs Kensol solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-kensol"
---

# JA Solar vs Kensol

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 21 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Kensol leans bifacial (81% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Poland |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Gliwice |
| Founded | 2005 | 2014 |
| Employees | 37,289 | null |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year | null GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 |  |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [https://kensol.pl](https://kensol.pl) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Kensol is a Polish company founded in 2014 that focuses on providing innovative, ecological, and economical solutions for the renewable energy sector. They design equipment tailored to the needs of the Polish market, specializing in photovoltaic (PV) and heating (HVAC) systems. Kensol offers modern and integrated...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 21 | +483 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 460 W | +280 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 437 W | +19 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.00% | +1.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 22.04% | +0.91 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.296%/°C | +0.026 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 17 (81%) | +34 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 29.0 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 2 (9.5%) |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 6 (28.6%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 11 (52.4%) |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 2 (9.5%) |


## Power distribution

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 1 (4.8%) |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 20 (95.2%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (29%)


| Technology | JA Solar | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 2 (9.5%) |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 5 (23.8%) |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 6 (28.6%) |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 8 (38.1%) |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Kensol


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MNHTR2-BI-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MNHTR2-BI 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460-1) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MNHTR2-BI-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MNHTR2-BI 455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455-1) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MNHTR2-BI-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [KS450MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks450mnhtr3-bi) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MNHTR2-BI 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450-1) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MNHTR2-BI-445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [KS445MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks445mnhtr3-bi) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MNHTR2-BI 445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445-1) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar and Kensol represent two very different points on the solar manufacturing spectrum. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in China, has grown into one of the world's largest PV module producers, with a workforce exceeding 37,000 employees and a stated production capacity of over 100 GW. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status from both S&P Global Commodity Insights and Bloomberg, is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, and distributes products to more than 135 countries. Its portfolio spans 524 panel models, with PERC technology accounting for over 52% of offerings, while newer TOPCon lines such as the DeepBlue 4.0 Pro and 5.0 push maximum efficiency to 24.4% and maximum power to 740 Wp. Kensol, founded in 2014 and based in Gliwice, Poland, is a much smaller regional player with 21 panel models, a maximum output of 460 Wp, and no publicly disclosed production capacity or employee figures. It does not appear on major Tier 1 bankability lists.

On a technical level, Kensol's compact portfolio competes well in several key metrics. Its average module efficiency of 22.04% exceeds JA Solar's portfolio average of 20.87%, and its average temperature coefficient of Pmax at -0.296%/°C is more favorable than JA Solar's -0.323%/°C - meaning Kensol modules retain more rated output during high-temperature conditions, which is relevant for residential rooftop installs. Kensol also fields a notably high bifacial share of approximately 81% of its lineup compared to 44% for JA Solar, and offers a slightly longer average warranty of 29 years versus 27.85 years. As a European manufacturer, Kensol is insulated from import tariff risk that can affect Chinese suppliers, making it a pragmatic choice for EU-market buyers seeking supply chain resilience in residential and light commercial C&I segments. JA Solar's core advantage lies in its massive portfolio breadth, certified bankability, and demonstrated suitability for utility-scale ground-mount and large C&I projects where volume supply, financial guarantees, and long-term manufacturer stability are non-negotiable.

For buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges on project scale and financing requirements. JA Solar is the lower-risk option for any bank-financed or large-scale deployment, backed by its Tier 1 status and consistent PVEL Top Performer recognition. Kensol suits smaller residential and commercial buyers in Poland and the broader EU who prioritize a European supply chain, strong bifacial coverage, and competitive average efficiency - provided they are comfortable with a less-established financial backstop behind the warranty.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-kensol)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-kensol)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-kensol)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-kensol

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.