---
title: "JA Solar vs Jolywood - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs Jolywood solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-jolywood"
---

# JA Solar vs Jolywood

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 128 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Beijing | Taizhou |
| Founded | 2005 | 2008 |
| Employees | 37,289 |  |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 | SZSE: 300393 |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [https://www.jolywood.cn](https://www.jolywood.cn) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 128 | +376 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 715 W | +25 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 554 W | +97 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.60% | +1.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 22.54% | +1.41 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.284%/°C | +0.038 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 110 (86%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +2.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jolywood skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 11 (8.6%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 89 (69.5%) |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 28 (21.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 42 (32.8%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 38 (29.7%) |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 40 (31.2%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 8 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)


| Technology | JA Solar | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 122 (95.3%) |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 6 (4.7%) |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jolywood


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JW-HD132N-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JW-HD132N-695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, with a production capacity exceeding 100 GW and a workforce of over 37,000 employees. The company jointly topped Wood Mackenzie's global solar module manufacturer ranking for H1 2025 alongside Trina Solar, underscoring its dominant market position. Jolywood, established in 2008, operates at a considerably smaller scale - approximately 3 GW of production capacity - but has carved out a clear niche as a specialist in bifacial N-type TOPCon panels, positioning itself as a technology-focused manufacturer rather than a volume player. Both companies are listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE) and carry Tier 1 bankable status, making them financeable options for project developers and institutional investors alike.

JA Solar's broad portfolio of 524 panels is anchored by PERC technology (around 52% of its lineup), with an average efficiency of 20.9% and a maximum of 24.4%. Its scale, supply chain depth, and wide product range make it a reliable choice for large utility-scale ground-mount projects as well as residential rooftop installs where price competitiveness and product availability are priorities. Jolywood's 128-panel portfolio is concentrated almost entirely on TOPCon technology (95.3%), delivering an average efficiency of 22.5% and a notably better average temperature coefficient of -0.28%/°C compared to JA Solar's -0.32%/°C. With 85.9% of its panels bifacial and an average output of 553 Wp, Jolywood is clearly oriented toward commercial C&I and utility-scale ground-mount applications where higher efficiency and improved thermal performance translate into measurable energy yield gains. Jolywood also provides a uniform 30-year warranty across its portfolio, versus JA Solar's average of approximately 27.9 years.

For international buyers choosing between the two, JA Solar represents the lower-risk, higher-availability option - well suited to buyers who need scale, broad product selection, and proven bankability across diverse project types. Jolywood is the stronger candidate for buyers seeking a premium, high-efficiency TOPCon bifacial product, particularly in commercial or ground-mount projects where the better temperature coefficient and high bifaciality ratio can deliver a meaningful uplift in annual energy production.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jolywood)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jolywood)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jolywood)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-jolywood

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.