---
title: "JA Solar vs Jinergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JA Solar vs Jinergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-jinergy"
---

# JA Solar vs Jinergy

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 10 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | JA Solar | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Beijing |  |
| Founded | 2005 | 2014 |
| Employees | 37,289 |  |
| Annual capacity | 100+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | SZSE: 002459 |  |
| Website | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) | [https://www.jinergy.com](https://www.jinergy.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JA Solar | Jinergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 504 | 10 | +494 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 510 W | +230 W |
| Avg Power | 456 W | 478 W | +21 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JA Solar | Jinergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.27% | +1.53 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.13% | 21.93% | +0.80 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JA Solar | Jinergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.330%/°C | +0.008 |
| Bifacial Share | 238 (47%) | 5 (50%) | +3 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +2.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinergy skews to higher efficiency: 20% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JA Solar | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 112 (22.2%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 99 (19.6%) | 2 (20.0%) |
| 21-22% | 112 (22.2%) | 3 (30.0%) |
| 22-23% | 107 (21.2%) | 3 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 74 (14.7%) | 2 (20.0%) |


## Power distribution

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)


| Power band | JA Solar | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 142 (28.2%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 173 (34.3%) | 7 (70.0%) |
| 500-599W | 120 (23.8%) | 3 (30.0%) |
| 600-699W | 60 (11.9%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (1.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (50%)


| Technology | JA Solar | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 247 (49.0%) | 5 (50.0%) |
| TOPCon | 146 (29.0%) | 5 (50.0%) |
| N-type | 90 (17.9%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 16 (3.2%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (1.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKL132-B-510MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-510mh) | 510 | 21.5 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKL132-B-505MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-505mh) | 505 | 21.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKL132-B-500MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-500mh) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKL132-B-495MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-495mh) | 495 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKL132-B-490MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-490mh) | 490 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JLSJG-D-465NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-465nb) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JLSJG-D-460NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-460nb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JLSJG-D-455NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-455nb) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JLSJG-D-450NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-450nb) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JLSJG-D-445NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-445nb) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's leading solar module manufacturers with a workforce of over 37,000 employees, a production capacity exceeding 100 GW, and a listing on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status, making it eligible for project financing from major international institutions. In 2024, JA Solar shipped approximately 79.4 GW of modules - a nearly 40% year-on-year increase - and earned the "Top Brand PV" designation in nine European markets, including Poland. Jinergy, founded in 2014, operates as a considerably smaller and younger player without Tier 1 bankable status, currently offering a focused portfolio of just 10 modules. These structural differences reflect a significant gap in market reach, financial backing, and geographic footprint between the two manufacturers.

JA Solar's portfolio of 524 modules spans a wide range of cell technologies, led by PERC at 52.1% of the lineup alongside newer TOPCon products. Its maximum panel power of 740 Wp and broad model range make it well suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial (C&I) installations, and residential rooftop systems alike. Jinergy's narrower but focused portfolio achieves a higher average module efficiency of 21.93% and a maximum efficiency of 23.27%, with bifacial modules accounting for 50% of its range - attributes that are particularly appealing for space-constrained residential or commercial rooftop installations where energy yield per square meter is critical. Jinergy also offers a longer average warranty of 30 years compared to JA Solar's average of 27.85 years, which may attract buyers with an extended investment horizon.

For international buyers working on bankable projects, utility-scale developments, or European C&I installations, JA Solar's Tier 1 status, substantial supply chain depth, and well-established European distribution network make it the lower-risk and more versatile choice. Jinergy may appeal to buyers seeking a compact, high-efficiency module lineup with strong warranty terms for residential or smaller commercial projects, but the absence of Tier 1 bankable status limits its suitability for finance-dependent or large-scale deployments.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinergy)
- [JA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinergy)
- [JA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-jinergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.