--- title: "Isola New Energy vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Isola New Energy vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/isola-new-energy-vs-trina-solar" --- # Isola New Energy vs Trina Solar Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 55 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Isola New Energy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Taizhou, Zhejiang Province | Changzhou | | Founded | 2006 | 1997 | | Employees | 101 - 500 | | | Annual capacity | 3 GW/year | | | Tier 1 | | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | Zhejiang Isola New Energy Co., Ltd. is a tech-oriented enterprise involved in R&D, production, and installation of solar products including solar cells, solar panels, solar street lighting and on/off-grid solar systems. The company has a strong supplier network and operates three factories in Ningbo and Shandong... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Isola New Energy | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 55 | 340 | +285 | | Max Power | 720 W | 760 W | +40 W | | Avg Power | 333 W | 520 W | +187 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Isola New Energy | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.27% | 24.80% | +1.53 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 19.82% | 21.71% | +1.89 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Isola New Energy | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.341%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.039 | | Bifacial Share | 9 (16%) | 145 (43%) | +26 pp | | Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.5 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Isola New Energy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 28 (50.9%) | 22 (6.5%) | | 20-21% | 14 (25.5%) | 57 (16.8%) | | 21-22% | 4 (7.3%) | 83 (24.4%) | | 22-23% | 5 (9.1%) | 102 (30.0%) | | 23%+ | 4 (7.3%) | 76 (22.4%) | ## Power distribution Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup) | Power band | Isola New Energy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 34 (61.8%) | 28 (8.2%) | | 400-499W | 13 (23.6%) | 142 (41.8%) | | 500-599W | 5 (9.1%) | 54 (15.9%) | | 700W+ | 3 (5.5%) | 44 (12.9%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **Flexible** (29%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%) | Technology | Isola New Energy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 22 (40.0%) | 11 (3.2%) | | Flexible | 16 (29.1%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 9 (16.4%) | 248 (72.9%) | | PERC | 8 (14.5%) | 75 (22.1%) | | N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) | ## Top panels, Isola New Energy | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [YH720W-33MHD/MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/isola-new-energy-yh720w-33mhd-mh) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [YH715W-33MHD/MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/isola-new-energy-yh715w-33mhd-mh) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [YH710W-33MHD/MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/isola-new-energy-yh710w-33mhd-mh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [YH590W-36MHD/MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/isola-new-energy-yh590w-36mhd-mh) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [YH585W-36MHD/MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/isola-new-energy-yh585w-36mhd-mh) | 585 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [YH550W-36MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/isola-new-energy-yh550w-36mh) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [YH545W-36MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/isola-new-energy-yh545w-36mh) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [YH540W-36MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/isola-new-energy-yh540w-36mh) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [YH465W-27MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/isola-new-energy-yh465w-27mhd) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [YH460W-36MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/isola-new-energy-yh460w-36mh) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Trina Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Isola New Energy, operating under the registered name Zhejiang Isola New Energy Co., Ltd., is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province, with production facilities in Ningbo and Shandong. The company reports approximately 15 years of industry experience and a production capacity of roughly 3 GW per year on its automated lines for high-wattage modules, alongside a 1.5 GW semi-automated line covering smaller formats, and it maintains branch offices or representative presences in over ten countries including Germany, Denmark, and the Netherlands. Isola New Energy does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 module manufacturer list, which constrains its suitability for bank-financed project procurement. Trina Solar was founded in December 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu, by Gao Jifan - one of the earliest dedicated PV companies globally - and has grown into the world's fourth-largest module shipper by volume, dispatching over 70 GW in 2024 alone, with cumulative global shipments surpassing 225 GW by early 2025. It holds confirmed Tier 1 status from BloombergNEF, reaffirmed in Q1 2025, and is targeting module production capacity of approximately 120 GW by year-end 2025. On every measure of institutional scale and bankability, Trina Solar carries the far stronger footprint. Isola New Energy's catalog covers a notably wide power range - from compact panels of just a few watts for portable and off-grid use through mid-range residential modules up to high-wattage units in the 550-720 W bracket aimed at commercial and utility ground-mount projects. The company markets a 30-year product warranty and positions itself as a cost-competitive alternative to the largest Chinese brands, making it a plausible option for price-sensitive buyers in smaller installation segments. Trina Solar organizes its lineup around the Vertex platform. The Vertex N series is built on TOPCon cell technology; the i-TOPCon Ultra variant reaches 760 W output and 24.5% module efficiency and targets utility-scale ground-mount deployment. The Vertex S+ G3, a dual-glass TOPCon line offering up to 485 W, covers residential rooftop and C&I applications, with a Full Black variant available for aesthetics-sensitive installations. The Vertex N family received an overall highest achiever designation from independent testing body RETC, underscoring the technological maturity of the platform. For the majority of buyers - residential installers, commercial project developers, or utility-scale financiers - Trina Solar is the lower-risk default choice. Its BNEF Tier 1 bankability status, production depth, and the proven Vertex platform reduce procurement risk and ease project financing across international markets. Isola New Energy is a reasonable fit for cost-focused buyers working on smaller residential rooftop or off-grid installations where bankability requirements do not apply and where price competitiveness outweighs the need for institutional credibility. The two brands are not interchangeable at utility or financed commercial scale; in the residential rooftop segment the decision ultimately comes down to price point and local distributor availability. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Isola New Energy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/isola-new-energy-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar) - [Isola New Energy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/isola-new-energy-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar) - [Isola New Energy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/isola-new-energy-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/isola-new-energy-vs-trina-solar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.