---
title: "Hyundai vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Hyundai vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 65 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2004 | 1997 |
| Employees | 206 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |  |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 340 | +275 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 760 W | +120 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 520 W | +78 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 24.80% | +1.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 21.71% | +0.22 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.002 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 145 (43%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Hyundai | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 0 |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hyundai Energy Solutions is a South Korean solar manufacturer headquartered in Seongnam, established in 2004 as a subsidiary of HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, one of Korea's largest industrial conglomerates. The company operates with an annual production capacity of approximately 1.4 GW and holds Tier 1 bankable status, giving it credibility with project finance institutions. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese photovoltaics powerhouse founded in 1997 and publicly listed on the Shanghai stock exchange, headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. By mid-2025 the company had shipped over 292 GW of modules cumulatively, and BloombergNEF awarded it a 100% bankability rating for the eighth time, including in Q2 2025. On institutional scale and global recognition, Trina Solar is significantly ahead.

Hyundai's product range is oriented primarily toward residential rooftop and small-to-medium commercial installations. The company has developed N-type TOPCon modules reaching efficiency levels in the 22-23% range, backed by product and linear performance warranties of 25-30 years. It is a competent choice for homeowners and smaller EPCs seeking a non-Chinese supply chain. Trina Solar addresses the full market spectrum - residential, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount - through several distinct product families. Its flagship Vertex N series incorporates the proprietary i-TOPCon Ultra technology, which added 30-40 W per module in late 2024, cementing Trina's claim to be leading the TOPCon 2.0 generation. The company's 210 mm large-format modules have been widely adopted in utility projects globally, and Kiwa PVEL awarded Trina Solar the TOP Performer distinction for the eleventh consecutive year in 2025.

For a standard buyer - whether a homeowner in Europe or a developer procuring for a commercial rooftop - both brands are bankable and well-warranted options. Hyundai suits buyers who prioritize a Korean manufacturing pedigree and a focused, straightforward product line. Trina Solar is the stronger default for larger projects, offering broader module choice, consistently top independent test results, and a proven global supply chain at scale.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.