--- title: "Hyundai vs Tesla - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Hyundai vs Tesla solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-tesla" --- # Hyundai vs Tesla Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 0 models). Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Hyundai | Tesla | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | South Korea | USA | | Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Austin | | Founded | 2004 | 2003 | | Employees | 206 | 100000+ | | Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year | | | Tier 1 | yes | | | Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | NASDAQ: TSLA | | Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.tesla.com](https://www.tesla.com) | HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation... Tesla, Inc. is an American multinational automotive and clean energy company headquartered in Austin, Texas. The company designs, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles, battery energy storage devices, solar panels and solar roof tiles, and related products and services. Tesla is working towards end-to-end solar... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Hyundai | Tesla | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 65 | 0 | +65 | | Max Power | 640 W | 0 W | +640 W | | Avg Power | 442 W | 0 W | +442 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Hyundai | Tesla | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.40% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Hyundai | Tesla | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 0 (0%) | +66 pp | | Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Hyundai | Tesla | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 0 | ## Power distribution Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup) | Power band | Hyundai | Tesla | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%) | Technology | Hyundai | Tesla | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 0 | | PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 0 | | Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 0 | ## Top panels, Hyundai | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Hyundai is a South Korean manufacturer whose solar roots trace back to Hyundai Heavy Industries in the early 1970s, with dedicated photovoltaic module production scaling up through its Hyundai Energy Solutions subsidiary. The company holds confirmed Tier 1 bankability status with BloombergNEF, reflecting its ability to support project financing at scale, and has grown its annual module production capacity to roughly 1.4 GW. Tesla entered the solar space through its 2016 acquisition of SolarCity and operates today primarily as a vertically integrated residential installer - selling panels as part of a bundled system - rather than as a traditional module manufacturer with independently verified GW-scale factory output. No Tier 1 designation has been confirmed for Tesla's solar offering. On institutional footprint and manufacturing depth, Hyundai carries the stronger standing. Hyundai's catalog spans the residential-focused XG Series and the bifacial YH Series, with the company's more advanced lines using N-type TOPCon cell technology, confirmed by multiple independent reviewers. The panels are positioned as competitive mid-premium products suited to residential rooftops and light commercial installations across the US, Europe, and Australia. Tesla's residential offering centers on the T400H, an all-black 400 W module designed foremost for aesthetic integration with the Powerwall battery and home EV charging. Its efficiency range of roughly 19 to 21 percent is comparable to Hyundai's mainstream lines, but Tesla's value proposition is the bundled ecosystem rather than the panel hardware itself. Both brands target the residential segment, but Hyundai sells through the installer channel while Tesla sells direct to consumers. For a buyer focused purely on the panel as a product - warranty depth, bankability, and technology roadmap - Hyundai is the more conventional and well-documented choice in 2025. Tesla makes more sense for homeowners who want a single contract covering panels, storage, and installation, and who are comfortable with the brand's service record, which has drawn mixed customer feedback. The two brands are not interchangeable: Hyundai is a manufacturer, Tesla is an installer-integrator. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels in 2025 - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.cleanenergyreviews.info/blog/hyundai-solar-panels-review \| Hyundai Solar Panels Review - Clean Energy Reviews \| review \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/are-tesla-solar-panels-the-best-option \| How Much Do Tesla Solar Panels Cost? 2025 Cost Data - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/tesla-review \| Tesla Solar Panels Review 2026 Costs and Services - EcoWatch \| review \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2020/02/26/tesla-and-panasonic-are-scrapping-their-partnership-in-solar-cell-production-at-the-buffalo-factory/ \| Tesla and Panasonic scrap solar cell production partnership at Buffalo \| article Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Tesla](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tesla) - [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Tesla](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tesla) - [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Tesla](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-tesla) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-tesla Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.