--- title: "Hyundai vs Tangra - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Hyundai vs Tangra solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-tangra" --- # Hyundai vs Tangra Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 0 models). Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Hyundai | Tangra | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | South Korea | China | | Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Wuxi | | Founded | 2004 | 2016 | | Employees | 206 | 500-1000 | | Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year | 5-10 GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | | | Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.thornova-solar.com](https://www.thornova-solar.com) | HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation... Tangra is the flagship solar module product line of Sunova Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (rebranded as Thornova Solar), a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer founded in 2016 and headquartered in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province. The company specializes in high-efficiency N-type TOPCon bifacial modules under the Tangra series (S, M... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Hyundai | Tangra | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 65 | 0 | +65 | | Max Power | 640 W | 0 W | +640 W | | Avg Power | 442 W | 0 W | +442 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Hyundai | Tangra | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.40% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Hyundai | Tangra | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 0 (0%) | +66 pp | | Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Hyundai | Tangra | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 0 | ## Power distribution Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup) | Power band | Hyundai | Tangra | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%) | Technology | Hyundai | Tangra | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 0 | | PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 0 | | Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 0 | ## Top panels, Hyundai | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Hyundai Energy Solutions is the solar division of South Korea's HD Hyundai conglomerate, drawing on the broader Hyundai Group's decades of industrial manufacturing heritage. The company holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status, meaning major financial institutions accept its panels as collateral for project financing, and its R&D center carries accredited test laboratory recognition from both UL and VDE. Hyundai Energy Solutions operates with over 1.4 GW of reported annual module production capacity and secured a 36 MW U.S. supply agreement in 2025. Tangra is the flagship product line from Thornova Solar, a US-founded manufacturer established in 2022 that built a reputation around premium N-type modules before its brand and intellectual property were acquired by ICE EYE in 2025 - a development buyers should investigate when assessing long-term warranty support. On institutional footprint and continuity, Hyundai Energy Solutions holds the stronger position by a clear margin. Hyundai Energy Solutions' catalog centers on residential and light-commercial rooftop applications, led by the XG Series and YH Series, which employ N-type TOPCon and shingled cell technology at module efficiencies around 20.5%-20.6% and carry a 25-to-30-year performance warranty with an annual degradation ceiling of 0.25%. Thornova's Tangra line occupies a different segment - the Tangra M Pro and Tangra L Pro are large-format, N-type TOPCon bifacial dual-glass modules in the 575 W to 720 W range, with efficiency reaching up to 23.2% and a 30-year linear performance warranty at 0.40% annual degradation. The Tangra M Pro was recognized as a Kiwa PVEL Top Performer across all seven reliability test categories and passed an enhanced 40 mm hail stress test, credentials that suit utility-scale and commercial ground-mount deployments more than typical residential rooftops. For a residential buyer in 2025, Hyundai Energy Solutions is the lower-risk default choice - its Tier 1 bankability, established installer network, and corporate stability reduce project uncertainty. The Tangra line offers technically impressive credentials and high power output that fit large commercial or utility contexts well, but the 2025 ownership transfer introduces questions about warranty continuity that should be resolved with the current owner, ICE EYE, before any purchase commitment. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels \| Hyundai Solar Panels Review - Cost, Ratings and Reviews \| review \- https://gosolarquotes.com.au/review/hyundai-solar-panels/ \| Hyundai Solar Panels Review - Are They Worth It? 2026 Guide \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/64266 \| Thornova Solar Tangra TS-BGT78 615-640W Panel Datasheet - ENF Solar \| article Sources: \- \[Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels) \- \[Hyundai Solar Panels Review - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels) \- \[Hyundai Solar Panels Review - GoSolarQuotes\](https://gosolarquotes.com.au/review/hyundai-solar-panels/) \- \[Thornova Solar Tangra Panel Datasheet - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/64266) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Tangra](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tangra) - [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Tangra](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tangra) - [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Tangra](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-tangra) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-tangra Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.