---
title: "Hyundai vs SpolarPV - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs SpolarPV solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-spolarpv"
---

# Hyundai vs SpolarPV

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 62 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | SpolarPV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Suzhou |
| Founded | 2004 |  |
| Employees | 206 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |  |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.spolarpv.com](https://www.spolarpv.com) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | SpolarPV | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 62 | +3 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 700 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 488 W | +46 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | SpolarPV | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 22.86% | +0.54 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 20.81% | +0.68 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | SpolarPV | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.333%/°C | +0.033 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 17 (27%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 27.7 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | SpolarPV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 15 (24.2%) |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 8 (12.9%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 20 (32.3%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 19 (30.6%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

SpolarPV offers more 600W+ panels (18% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | SpolarPV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 16 (25.8%) |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 13 (21.0%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 22 (35.5%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 10 (16.1%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 1 (1.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%)


| Technology | Hyundai | SpolarPV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 0 |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 30 (48.4%) |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 28 (45.2%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 4 (6.5%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, SpolarPV


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SPV700-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv700-tg12-132bd) | 700 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SPV695-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv695-tg12-132bd) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SPV690-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv690-tg12-132bd) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SPV685-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv685-tg12-132bd) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SPV680-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv680-tg12-132bd) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SPV675-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv675-tg12-132bd) | 675 | 21.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SPV670-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv670-tg12-132bd) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SPV665-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv665-tg12-132bd) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SPV660-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv660-tg12-132bd) | 660 | 21.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SP605HM6-60L](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-sp605hm6-60l) | 605 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs SpolarPV](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-spolarpv)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs SpolarPV](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-spolarpv)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs SpolarPV](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-spolarpv)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-spolarpv

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.