--- title: "Hyundai vs Sharp - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Hyundai vs Sharp solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-sharp" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/hyundai/sharp.png" --- # Hyundai vs Sharp Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 19 models). Sharp leads on peak efficiency at 23.82%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Hyundai | Sharp | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | South Korea | Japan | | Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Sakai, Osaka Prefecture | | Founded | 2004 | 1912 | | Employees | 206 | 40,123 | | Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year | 15.4 GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | TYO: 6753 | | Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://global.sharp](https://global.sharp) | HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation... Sharp Corporation is a Japanese electronics company founded in 1912. It operates globally, offering a wide range of products including consumer electronics, home appliances, energy solutions, and business solutions. Since 2016, it has been majority-owned by Foxconn. ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Hyundai | Sharp | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 65 | 19 | +46 | | Max Power | 640 W | 740 W | +100 W | | Avg Power | 442 W | 576 W | +133 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Hyundai | Sharp | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 23.82% | +0.42 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 22.20% | +0.71 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Hyundai | Sharp | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.000 | | Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 10 (53%) | +14 pp | | Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 27.6 yrs | +0.2 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Sharp skews to higher efficiency: 32% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Hyundai | Sharp | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 1 (5.3%) | | 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 7 (36.8%) | | 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 5 (26.3%) | | 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 6 (31.6%) | ## Power distribution Sharp offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup) | Power band | Hyundai | Sharp | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 6 (31.6%) | | 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 6 (31.6%) | | 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 0 | 7 (36.8%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: HJT (38%) Dominant cell tech: HJT (37%) | Technology | Hyundai | Sharp | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 7 (36.8%) | | PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 7 (36.8%) | | Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 5 (26.3%) | ## Top panels, Hyundai | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Sharp | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [GSD8K66H-740WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-740wt) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [GSD8K66H-735WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-735wt) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [GSD8K66H-730WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-730wt) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [GSD8K66H-725WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-725wt) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [GSD8K66H-720WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-720wt) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [GSD8K66H-715WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-715wt) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [GSD8K66H-710WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-710wt) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [NB-JD580](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [NB-JD575](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd575) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [NB-JD570](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd570) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Hyundai Energy Solutions is a South Korean manufacturer headquartered in Seoul, operating as a standalone company since 2016 after being spun off from Hyundai Heavy Industries - a Fortune 500 conglomerate - though its solar activity traces back to 2004. The company produces panels in-house in South Korea and sells actively across the United States, Europe, Australia, and Asia, recently securing an approximately $85 million module supply agreement for a utility-scale project in the US. Sharp's solar history is considerably older: Japan's Sharp Corporation began mass production of solar cells in 1963, making it one of the world's earliest commercial PV producers, though today its solar operations are concentrated under Sharp Energy Solutions Corporation and focus primarily on the Japanese domestic market after Sharp withdrew from Western markets between 2012 and 2015 amid financial pressure and Chinese competition. Neither brand currently appears on the widely-cited BloombergNEF Tier 1 module list, which as of 2025-2026 is dominated by large Chinese manufacturers; Hyundai, however, carries the stronger institutional footprint in international markets. Both companies have converged on N-Type TOPCon monocrystalline silicon as their primary cell technology, reflecting the broader industry shift away from PERC. Hyundai's lineup spans residential and light commercial rooftop applications, with a standard residential series and a bifacial variant suited to installations that can capture rear-side gain, backed by 25-year product and performance warranties. Sharp's current models - including the NU-JC435 and NU-JC440 - target residential and commercial rooftops in Japan with comparable efficiency and a notably generous 30-year performance guarantee, but their limited availability outside Japan is a meaningful constraint for most international buyers. For buyers outside Japan, Hyundai Energy Solutions is the more practical default in 2025: panels are broadly available, supported by a large industrial parent, and competitively priced in major markets. Sharp is the stronger choice for Japanese domestic installations, where its brand recognition, long track record, and local service infrastructure carry real weight. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/hyundai-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Hyundai Solar Panels: The Complete Review - EnergySage \| review \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/sharp-solar-panels \| Sharp Solar Panels: How They Compare to Other Top Brands - SolarReviews \| review \- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/ \| HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells \| article \- https://www.gpsolarpanels.com/sharp-solar-panels/ \| Sharp Solar Panels: Complete Guide, Model Specifications and History \| review Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sharp) - [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sharp) - [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sharp) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-sharp Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.