---
title: "Hyundai vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-runergy"
---

# Hyundai vs Runergy

Runergy has the broader catalog (124 vs 65 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 2004 | 2013 |
| Employees | 206 | 15,000 |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |  |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 124 | +59 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 740 W | +100 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 579 W | +137 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 24.10% | +0.70 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 22.42% | +0.93 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.002 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 95 (77%) | +10 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +1.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 9 (7.3%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 26 (21.0%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 48 (38.7%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 41 (33.1%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 36 (29.0%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 28 (22.6%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 35 (28.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 25 (20.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%)


| Technology | Hyundai | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 18 (14.5%) |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 32 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 0 | 74 (59.7%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hyundai Energy Solutions is a South Korean manufacturer that traces its solar roots to 2004, when parent company Hyundai Heavy Industries entered the photovoltaic market. It became an independent entity in 2016, and today operates module production capacity of roughly 1.35 GW in South Korea. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, meaning institutional lenders are willing to finance projects built around its panels. Runergy, headquartered in Jiangsu, China, is a considerably younger brand that entered the Tier 1 ranks in 2023 and has maintained BNEF Tier 1 status for at least six consecutive quarters through Q1 2025. It operates at a much larger production scale, with cited cell-manufacturing capacity of around 21 GW, and markets modules in the United States under its Hyperion sub-brand, including from a manufacturing facility in Huntsville, Alabama. In terms of institutional footprint and brand recognition, Hyundai carries the advantage of a globally known parent name and a longer audited track record, while Runergy competes on volume and aggressive capacity expansion.

On the product side, Hyundai's current lineup is centered on N-type TOPCon technology, with the XG Series targeting residential rooftops and the YH Series offering bifacial designs suited to ground-mounted or small commercial installations. The company's R&D lab holds accredited test status from both UL and VDE, and its panels have appeared among top performers in independent thermal cycling and mechanical stress testing. Runergy's Hyperion-branded modules also lead with N-type TOPCon bifacial panels, with the HY-DH108N8B line targeting both utility-scale arrays and residential ground mounts. Runergy additionally maintains a PERC-based product stream for more cost-sensitive commercial applications, making its catalog somewhat broader in scope.

For a typical residential buyer in 2025 who values brand recognition, long-term service infrastructure, and independently verified performance data, Hyundai is the more conservative and likely safer choice. Runergy is the more compelling option for developers or commercial buyers seeking large-volume TOPCon bifacial supply at competitive pricing, particularly given its U.S. domestic production footprint. Neither brand is interchangeable with the other - they occupy slightly different niches, with Hyundai skewing premium-residential and Runergy skewing volume-commercial and utility.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels in 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/03/12/hyundai-builds-1-37-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-south-korea/ \| Hyundai builds 1.37 GW solar cell factory in South Korea - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://www.runergy.com/runergy-achieves-bnef-tier-1-pv-module-maker-status-for-six-consecutive-quarters/ \| Runergy Achieves BNEF Tier 1 PV Module Maker Status for Six Consecutive Quarters \| article

\- https://solarbytes.info/business-bytes/runergy-bnef-tier1-q1-2025-solar-module-expansion-8764407 \| Runergy secures BNEF Tier 1 PV Maker status for sixth quarter - SolarBytes \| article

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/hyundai-energy-solutions/ \| Hyundai Energy Solutions Solar Panels - EnergySage \| review

Sources:

\- \[Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels in 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Hyundai builds 1.37 GW solar cell factory in South Korea - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/03/12/hyundai-builds-1-37-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-south-korea/)

\- \[Runergy Achieves BNEF Tier 1 PV Module Maker Status for Six Consecutive Quarters\](https://www.runergy.com/runergy-achieves-bnef-tier-1-pv-module-maker-status-for-six-consecutive-quarters/)

\- \[Runergy secures BNEF Tier 1 PV Maker status for sixth quarter - SolarBytes\](https://solarbytes.info/business-bytes/runergy-bnef-tier1-q1-2025-solar-module-expansion-8764407)

\- \[Hyundai Energy Solutions Solar Panels - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/hyundai-energy-solutions/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-runergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.