---
title: "Hyundai vs Recom - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs Recom solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-recom"
---

# Hyundai vs Recom

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 61 models). Recom leads on peak efficiency at 24.30%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | Italy |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Bolzano |
| Founded | 2004 | 2007 |
| Employees | 206 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |  |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.recom-tech.com](https://www.recom-tech.com) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 61 | +4 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 730 W | +90 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 548 W | +105 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 24.30% | +0.90 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 22.68% | +1.19 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.284%/°C | +0.016 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 23 (38%) | +28 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +2.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Recom skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 5 (8.2%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 36 (59.0%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 20 (32.8%) |


## Power distribution

Recom offers more 600W+ panels (36% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 34 (55.7%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 5 (8.2%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 12 (19.7%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 10 (16.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (84%)


| Technology | Hyundai | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 5 (8.2%) |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 51 (83.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 5 (8.2%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Recom


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RCM-730-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-730-8dbnm) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RCM-725-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RCM-720-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RCM-715-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8dbnm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RCM-715-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8nm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RCM-710-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8dbnm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RCM-710-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8nm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RCM-705-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8dbnm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RCM-705-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8nm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RCM-700-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-700-8nm) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hyundai Energy Solutions, operating under the HD Hyundai conglomerate and headquartered in South Korea, has been manufacturing solar modules for several decades and holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status. Its annual module production capacity is reported at approximately 1.4 GW, giving it a mid-tier manufacturing footprint by global standards. Recom Technologies, founded in 2007 and initially based in Greece before relocating its headquarters to Milan, Italy, is one of the very few European manufacturers to have achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, which it first earned in Q4 2019. Recom operates cell and module production facilities in Lannion, France and Padua, Italy. Between the two, Hyundai carries the stronger institutional name recognition globally, backed by the broader Hyundai industrial brand, while Recom holds a more distinct position as a credible independent European manufacturer.

On the product side, Hyundai's lineup spans residential rooftop and mid-scale commercial applications, with its recent modules leaning on N-type TOPCon cell technology and reported efficiencies in the low-to-mid 20 percent range. Recom's portfolio is similarly oriented around TOPCon as its dominant technology, and the company has also pushed into HJT modules. Its panels cover a wide wattage range suited for both residential and utility-adjacent commercial projects. Recom has been cited as a notable performer in high-efficiency back-contact formats and offers a 30-year performance warranty across much of its lineup, which stands out in the European market.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Hyundai is the more accessible choice in North America and Asia-Pacific markets where distributor networks are well established, while Recom is the stronger default for European buyers who want a locally manufactured, bankable alternative to Chinese brands. Neither brand is a clear universal winner - the right choice depends largely on geography, installer support, and whether warranty terms from a European versus Korean-backed entity better suit the project's financing requirements.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/recom/ \| RECOM Solar Panels - EnergySage \| review

\- https://recom-tech.com/recom-bloomberg-tier1/ \| RECOM achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 Module Maker status \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/hyundai \| Hyundai Solar Panels Review 2025 - ComparePV \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/recom \| Recom Solar Panels Review 2025 - ComparePV \| review

Sources:

\- \[SolarReviews - Hyundai Solar Panels Review\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[EnergySage - RECOM Solar Panels\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/recom/)

\- \[RECOM Technologies - Bloomberg Tier 1 Announcement\](https://recom-tech.com/recom-bloomberg-tier1/)

\- \[ComparePV - Hyundai Review\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/hyundai)

\- \[ComparePV - Recom Review\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/recom)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-recom)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-recom)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-recom)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-recom

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.