---
title: "Hyundai vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-q-cells"
---

# Hyundai vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 65 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Seoul |
| Founded | 2004 | 1999 |
| Employees | 206 | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 89 | +24 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 675 W | +35 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 468 W | +26 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 23.20% | +0.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 21.21% | +0.28 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.024 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 35 (39%) | +27 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Hyundai | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 0 |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hyundai Energy Solutions, now operating as HD Hyundai Energy Solutions, is a South Korean manufacturer founded around 2004-2005 as part of the broader HD Hyundai industrial group. Headquartered in Eumseong, South Korea, it holds Tier 1 bankable status and runs roughly 1.4 GW of annual production capacity. Q CELLS began as a German brand and is now the solar division of Hanwha, one of South Korea's largest conglomerates; its European engineering roots combined with Hanwha's financial scale have given it consistent Bloomberg Tier 1 recognition and a far larger global footprint. Q CELLS has invested heavily in U.S. domestic manufacturing, with facilities in Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia targeting a combined capacity of up to 8.4 GW - the largest solar manufacturing presence in the Western Hemisphere. By any institutional measure, Q CELLS carries the stronger market position of the two.

Both brands primarily serve the residential and light-commercial rooftop segment, and both have moved toward N-type cell technology. HD Hyundai's current lineup centers on N-type TOPCon modules with reported efficiencies between 22.3% and 22.9%, backed by 25-30 year warranties. Q CELLS likewise offers TOPCon-based modules reaching around 22.5% efficiency, with a temperature coefficient as low as -0.29 degrees Celsius per degree - a specification that translates to meaningfully better output in hot climates compared to average-spec competitors. Q CELLS panels are generally priced roughly 15-20% below top-tier premium brands such as Maxeon while still delivering high-end performance metrics.

For most buyers in 2025, Q CELLS is the safer default. Its wider installer network, established U.S. supply chain, strong independent test results, and top-three ranking among industry reviewers give it a clear edge for both residential homeowners and commercial developers. HD Hyundai is a credible Tier 1 alternative - worth considering where local pricing or installer relationships favor it - but Q CELLS holds broader market confidence at this point.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Hyundai Solar Panels Complete Review 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels Expert Review 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/03/12/hyundai-builds-1-37-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-south-korea/ \| Hyundai builds 1.37 GW solar cell factory in South Korea - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2026/03/06/qcells-resumes-solar-panel-production-at-georgia-factories-following-customs-related-furlough/ \| Qcells resumes production at Georgia factories after furlough - PV Magazine USA \| article

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Q CELLS Solar Panels Complete Review - EnergySage \| review

Sources:

\- \[Complete Review Of Hyundai Solar Panels In 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Hyundai builds 1.37 GW solar cell factory in South Korea\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/03/12/hyundai-builds-1-37-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-south-korea/)

\- \[Qcells resumes solar panel production at Georgia factories\](https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2026/03/06/qcells-resumes-solar-panel-production-at-georgia-factories-following-customs-related-furlough/)

\- \[Q CELLS Solar Panels: The Complete Review - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.