--- title: "Hyundai vs Peimar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Hyundai vs Peimar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-peimar" --- # Hyundai vs Peimar Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 5 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Hyundai | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | South Korea | Italy | | Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Torino | | Founded | 2004 | 2012 | | Employees | 206 | 50 | | Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year | 0.3 GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | no | | Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | | | Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.peimar.com](https://www.peimar.com) | HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation... Peimar is an Italian manufacturer of photovoltaic modules. Based in Turin, the company designs and produces solar panels for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications, with a focus on the European market. ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Hyundai | Peimar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 65 | 5 | +60 | | Max Power | 640 W | 595 W | +45 W | | Avg Power | 442 W | 440 W | +2 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Hyundai | Peimar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 23.04% | +0.36 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 20.23% | +1.26 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Hyundai | Peimar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.346%/°C | +0.046 | | Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 2 (40%) | +26 pp | | Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +2.6 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Peimar skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Hyundai | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 2 (40.0%) | | 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 1 (20.0%) | | 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 2 (40.0%) | ## Power distribution Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup) | Power band | Hyundai | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 2 (40.0%) | | 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 1 (20.0%) | | 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 2 (40.0%) | | 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (60%) | Technology | Hyundai | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 0 | | PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 3 (60.0%) | | Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 2 (40.0%) | ## Top panels, Hyundai | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Peimar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [OR10H595MNDB](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h595mndb) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SA500M (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sa500m-fb) | 500 | 21.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [OR10H450MNDB (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h450mndb-fb) | 450 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SG330P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg330p) | 330 | 17.0 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline | | 5 | [SG325P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg325p) | 325 | 16.7 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline | ## Summary Hyundai Energy Solutions is a South Korean manufacturer operating under the broader HD Hyundai conglomerate, giving it a degree of corporate backing that few independent solar brands can match. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and reports annual module production capacity of over 1.4 GW. Peimar, by contrast, is a smaller independent manufacturer founded in 2007 and headquartered in Brescia, Italy, with production facilities in Castegnato and the UAE and a reported annual output of around 150 MW. Peimar does not appear on current BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists, which reflects its more limited project-financing track record relative to Hyundai's institutional footprint. On the product side, Hyundai Energy Solutions has transitioned into N-type TOPCon cell manufacturing and offers bifacial modules through its YH Series alongside its XG Series, positioning the brand in the mid-to-premium residential and light commercial segment. Peimar's catalog centers on monocrystalline half-cell modules - including panels up to 435 W - and the brand emphasizes mechanical robustness, citing wind-load ratings roughly double the standard 2400 Pa specification. Peimar's pricing tends to sit at the more accessible end of the European market, making it a practical option for installers seeking European-made panels at competitive cost. For a typical buyer in 2025, Hyundai Energy Solutions is the more conservative, bankable choice - particularly for projects requiring lender-approved equipment or long-term performance assurance backed by a large corporate parent. Peimar remains a credible niche option for European residential and small commercial installs where locally manufactured product and competitive pricing matter more than institutional bankability. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Hyundai Solar Panels Complete Review 2025 - SolarReviews \| review \- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/ \| HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells \| article \- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/21270/peimar-group/ \| Peimar Group Profile and Reviews - EnergySage \| review \- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/peimar-group \| Peimar Group Solar Panels - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/65510/tier-1-list-of-solar-panel-manufacturers-q1-2026/ \| Tier 1 List of Solar Panel Manufacturers Q1 2026 \| article Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-peimar) - [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-peimar) - [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-peimar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-peimar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.