---
title: "Hyundai vs Panasonic - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs Panasonic solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-panasonic"
---

# Hyundai vs Panasonic

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 25 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | Panasonic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | Japan |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Kadoma, near Ōsaka |
| Founded | 2004 | 1918 |
| Employees | 206 | 9,500+ |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year | 1+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | Tokyo Stock Exchange: 6752 |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.panasonic.com/global/energy/](https://www.panasonic.com/global/energy/) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Panasonic is a global leader in the development of innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors. The company was founded in 1918 by Konosuke Matsushita and has been committed to enhancing the quality...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | Panasonic | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 25 | +40 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 430 W | +210 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 367 W | +75 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | Panasonic | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 22.20% | +1.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 20.68% | +0.81 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | Panasonic | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.267%/°C | +0.033 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 4 (16%) | +50 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +2.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | Panasonic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 6 (24.0%) |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 8 (32.0%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 8 (32.0%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 3 (12.0%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | Panasonic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 19 (76.0%) |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 6 (24.0%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (88%)


| Technology | Hyundai | Panasonic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 22 (88.0%) |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 3 (12.0%) |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Panasonic


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [EVPV430HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv430hk2) | 430 | 22.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [EVPV420HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv420hk2) | 420 | 21.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [EVPV410H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410h) | 410 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [EVPV410HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410hk) | 410 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [EVPV400H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv400h) | 400 | 21.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [EVPV400HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv400hk) | 400 | 21.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [EVPV390HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv390hk) | 390 | 21.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [EVPV390H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv390h) | 390 | 21.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [EVPV380](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv380) | 380 | 21.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [EVPV370](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv370) | 370 | 21.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hyundai Energy Solutions, the solar division of South Korea's HD Hyundai conglomerate, has been manufacturing photovoltaic modules since the 1980s and holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status, meaning major financial institutions will finance projects using its panels. The division operates roughly 1.4 GW of annual production capacity and in 2025 secured a 36 MW supply agreement with U.S.-based Turning Point Energy, signaling continued commercial momentum. Panasonic, the Japanese electronics giant, pioneered its proprietary HIT heterojunction cell technology decades ago and long commanded a premium reputation in the residential solar market. However, on April 28, 2025, Panasonic North America announced it would discontinue its entire solar and battery storage business, ending production of the EverVolt line entirely. Hyundai therefore enters this comparison as an active, growing manufacturer while Panasonic is now a legacy brand with no new supply.

In terms of product families, Hyundai offers residential-oriented panels in its XG Series and bifacial modules in its YH Series suited to ground-mount and small commercial applications, using N-type TOPCon and shingled cell technology. Panasonic's EverVolt HK2 and PK2 series, built on HJT architecture with efficiency ratings confirmed above 22%, were widely regarded as among the best panels for space-constrained residential rooftops and high-temperature climates, thanks to industry-leading temperature coefficients. Panasonic's EverVolt panels were manufactured under an OEM arrangement with REC Group, and reviewers suggest the REC Alpha Pure-RX as the closest current equivalent for buyers who sought Panasonic quality.

For any buyer evaluating these two brands in 2025 or beyond, the choice is effectively settled by Panasonic's market exit. Hyundai Energy Solutions is the only viable option for new installations - offering solid Tier 1 bankability, a competitive mid-range price point, and active warranty support. Buyers who specifically want HJT technology comparable to the retired EverVolt line should look at REC Group or other active HJT manufacturers rather than sourcing remaining Panasonic stock.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Hyundai Solar Panels - Complete Review 2025 \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/panasonic-discontinues-solar-and-storage-line \| Panasonic Discontinues Solar and Battery Storage Line \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/05/01/panasonic-exits-solar-and-battery-storage-ending-decades-long-journe/ \| Panasonic exits solar and battery storage - pv magazine \| article

\- https://www.energysage.com/news/panasonic-exits-solar-and-energy-storage-market/ \| Panasonic is closing its solar and battery storage business \| article

\- https://cleantechnica.com/2025/04/30/panasonic-steps-away-from-solar-storage-ends-evervolt-line/ \| Panasonic Steps Away From Solar and Storage, Ends EverVolt Line \| article

Sources:

\- \[Hyundai Solar Panels - Complete Review 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Panasonic Discontinues Solar and Battery Storage Line\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/panasonic-discontinues-solar-and-storage-line)

\- \[Panasonic exits solar and battery storage - pv magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/05/01/panasonic-exits-solar-and-battery-storage-ending-decades-long-journe/)

\- \[Panasonic is closing its solar and battery storage business - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/news/panasonic-exits-solar-and-energy-storage-market/)

\- \[Panasonic Steps Away From Solar and Storage, Ends EverVolt Line - CleanTechnica\](https://cleantechnica.com/2025/04/30/panasonic-steps-away-from-solar-storage-ends-evervolt-line/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Panasonic](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-panasonic)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Panasonic](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-panasonic)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Panasonic](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-panasonic)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-panasonic

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.