---
title: "Hyundai vs Mission Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs Mission Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-mission-solar"
---

# Hyundai vs Mission Solar

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 24 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | United States |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si | San Antonio |
| Founded | 2004 | 2014 |
| Employees | 206 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |  |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.missionsolar.com](https://www.missionsolar.com) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | Mission Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 24 | +41 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 670 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 554 W | +111 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | Mission Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 23.00% | +0.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 22.11% | +0.62 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | Mission Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.313%/°C | +0.013 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 18 (75%) | +9 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +1.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Mission Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 2 (8.3%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 7 (29.2%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 13 (54.2%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 2 (8.3%) |


## Power distribution

Mission Solar offers more 600W+ panels (25% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 6 (25.0%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 12 (50.0%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 6 (25.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (38%)


| Technology | Hyundai | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 0 |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 9 (37.5%) |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 6 (25.0%) |
| N-type | 0 | 9 (37.5%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Mission Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MST12670HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12670hp3g) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MST12665HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12665hp3g) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MST12660HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12660hp3g) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MST12R620HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r620hn3g) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MST12R615HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r615hn3g) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [MST12R610HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r610hn3g) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MSH10-595HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-595hn4g) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MSI10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.9 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [MSH10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MSI10-585HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-585hn4g) | 585 | 22.7 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hyundai Energy Solutions is a South Korean manufacturer established in 2005 under Hyundai Heavy Industries, with its global headquarters in South Korea and a U.S. commercial office in Irvine, California. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and operates approximately 1.4 GW of annual production capacity. Mission Solar Energy, by contrast, was founded in 2014 and manufactures exclusively in San Antonio, Texas, making it one of the few genuinely domestic U.S. solar producers at meaningful scale - with current capacity around 1 GW after a 2024 expansion, and announced plans to add a further 2 GW by early 2026. Mission Solar is generally classified as a Tier 2 brand and does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists. On institutional footprint and financier recognition, Hyundai holds a clear advantage.

Hyundai's residential and light-commercial lineup includes the XG Series for rooftop installations and the bifacial YH Series aimed at ground-mounted systems. The company has confirmed use of N-type TOPCon and shingled cell technology in current products, and its performance warranty caps annual degradation at 0.4% after year one - tighter than the industry norm. Mission Solar's panels target residential and commercial rooftop applications using PERC cell technology and are manufactured entirely in the United States, making them eligible for the 10% domestic content bonus under current U.S. federal incentive rules. Mission Solar's stated annual degradation ceiling sits at 0.7%, and its product warranty runs 12 years versus Hyundai's 25-year product warranty.

For most buyers in 2025, Hyundai Energy Solutions is the lower-risk default - particularly for projects requiring project finance or long-term bankability assurances. Mission Solar is the more compelling choice for U.S. buyers whose economics hinge on domestic content incentives, supply-chain resilience, or shorter lead times. The two brands serve meaningfully different buyer profiles rather than being interchangeable.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete review of Hyundai solar panels - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/mission-solar-panels-complete-review \| Mission Solar panels complete review - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels \| Hyundai solar panels cost, ratings and reviews 2026 - EcoWatch \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/mission-solar-panels \| Mission Solar panels review 2026 - EcoWatch \| review

\- https://solartechonline.com/blog/mission-solar-panels-review-2025/ \| Mission Solar panels review 2025 - SolarTechOnline \| review

Sources:

\- \[Complete Review Of Hyundai Solar Panels In 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Mission Solar Panels: Complete Review - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/mission-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Hyundai Solar Panels Review (Cost, Ratings & Reviews in 2026) - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Mission Solar Panels 2026 Review - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/mission-solar-panels)

\- \[Mission Solar Panels Review 2025 - SolarTechOnline\](https://solartechonline.com/blog/mission-solar-panels-review-2025/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Mission Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-mission-solar)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Mission Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-mission-solar)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Mission Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-mission-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-mission-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.