---
title: "Hyundai vs Maxeon - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs Maxeon solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-maxeon"
---

# Hyundai vs Maxeon

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 36 models). Maxeon leads on peak efficiency at 24.00%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | Maxeon |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | Singapore |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Singapore |
| Founded | 2004 | 2020 |
| Employees | 206 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | NASDAQ: MAXN |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.maxeon.com](https://www.maxeon.com) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | Maxeon | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 36 | +29 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 555 W | +85 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 444 W | +1 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | Maxeon | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 24.00% | +0.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 21.36% | +0.13 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | Maxeon | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.294%/°C | +0.007 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 19 (53%) | +13 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 31.4 yrs | +4.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Maxeon skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | Maxeon |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 7 (19.4%) |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 4 (11.1%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 8 (22.2%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 14 (38.9%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 3 (8.3%) |


## Power distribution

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | Maxeon |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 7 (19.4%) |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 17 (47.2%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 12 (33.3%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (42%)


| Technology | Hyundai | Maxeon |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 0 |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 7 (19.4%) |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 12 (33.3%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 15 (41.7%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 2 (5.6%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Maxeon


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SPR-P7-555-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-555-com-s) | 555 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SPR-P7-550-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-550-com-s) | 550 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SPR-P7-545-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-545-com-s) | 545 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SPR-P7-540-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-540-com-s) | 540 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SPR-P7-535-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-535-com-s) | 535 | 21.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SPR-P7-530-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-530-com-s) | 530 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SPR-P6-525-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-525-upp) | 525 | 20.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SPR-P6-520-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-520-upp) | 520 | 20.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SPR-P6-515-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-515-upp) | 515 | 19.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SPR-P6-510-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-510-upp) | 510 | 19.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hyundai Energy Solutions - officially HD Hyundai Energy Solutions Co., Ltd. - is a South Korean manufacturer that launched its solar business in 2004 as part of Hyundai Heavy Industries and was repositioned as a standalone corporate entity in 2016. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status, meaning it is financeable by major lending institutions, and operates module manufacturing capacity of approximately 1.35 GW in South Korea, including a purpose-built cell factory in North Chungcheong Province that came online in 2021. Maxeon Solar Technologies was incorporated in Singapore in 2019 as a spinout from SunPower, inheriting roughly four decades of cell development and more than 2,000 granted patents. In early 2025 Maxeon completed the sale of its EMEA, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America operations to TCL Technology Group and pivoted to an exclusively U.S.-focused business, a restructuring that has raised questions about near-term financial stability. On institutional footprint and manufacturing scale, Hyundai currently carries the more stable position.

Hyundai's catalog is oriented toward premium residential rooftop and small commercial installations. Its XG Series targets standard residential rooftops, while the bifacial YH Series suits ground-mounted residential or light commercial systems. The company began mass production of N-type TOPCon cells at its Korean facility, moving beyond older PERC designs, and panels have performed well in independent durability testing covering thermal cycling, mechanical stress, hail resistance, PID, and LID/LETID. Maxeon's lineup splits into two tiers: the flagship Maxeon line uses interdigitated back-contact (IBC) cells - where all electrical contacts sit on the rear of the cell - to achieve some of the highest documented efficiency ratings available in the residential segment; and the Performance line uses a shingled cell architecture (originally based on Solaria patents acquired in 2023) that trades peak efficiency for lower cost and better partial-shade tolerance through parallel wiring.

For a typical residential buyer in 2025, Hyundai is the lower-risk default: confirmed Tier 1 bankability, a stable manufacturing base, competitive TOPCon efficiency, and long warranties backed by a large conglomerate. Maxeon's IBC technology is technically superior on efficiency and low-light performance, making it compelling where roof space is tightly constrained, but the company's ongoing restructuring and U.S. import disruptions in 2024-2025 introduce supply and long-term support uncertainty that buyers and installers should weigh carefully.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/03/12/hyundai-builds-1-37-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-south-korea/ \| Hyundai builds 1.37 GW solar cell factory in South Korea - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/ \| HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells \| article

\- https://www.sunhub.com/blog/maxeon-solar-panels-review-2025-efficiency-cost-and-warranty/ \| Maxeon Solar Panels Review 2025 - Efficiency, Cost and Warranty - Sunhub \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/hyundai-energy-solutions/ \| Hyundai Energy Solutions Solar Panels - EnergySage \| review

Sources:

\- \[Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Hyundai builds 1.37 GW solar cell factory in South Korea\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/03/12/hyundai-builds-1-37-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-south-korea/)

\- \[HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells\](https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/)

\- \[Maxeon Solar Panels Review 2025\](https://www.sunhub.com/blog/maxeon-solar-panels-review-2025-efficiency-cost-and-warranty/)

\- \[Hyundai Energy Solutions Solar Panels - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/hyundai-energy-solutions/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Maxeon](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-maxeon)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Maxeon](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-maxeon)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Maxeon](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-maxeon)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-maxeon

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

